Skip to main content

Is bitflow.finance a Scam? Security Check Results - Bitflow Foundation Reviews

bitflow.finance favicon

Is bitflow.finance Safe? Security Analysis for Bitflow Foundation

Check if bitflow.finance is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
ReactNext.jsVercel AnalyticsKlaviyoMicrosoft Clarity+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:03:14 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bitflow Finance is a decentralized exchange and DEX aggregator focused on Bitcoin liquidity on the Stacks blockchain. It offers users optimized swap rates across multiple decentralized exchanges and liquidity pools, enabling secure, transparent, and non-custodial trading of Bitcoin and related assets. The platform also supports yield earning on BTC deposits and plans to introduce BTC borrowing using stSTX collateral. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and a bug bounty program, though improvements are needed in privacy compliance and explicit security policies. Overall, Bitflow Finance presents a credible and specialized DeFi service targeting Bitcoin traders and enthusiasts.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsVercel AnalyticsKlaviyoMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bitflow Finance positions itself as a niche player in the DeFi space by focusing on Bitcoin liquidity on Stacks, differentiating from generic DEX aggregators. Its business model revolves around providing best swap rates, yield generation, and upcoming lending services, targeting savvy Bitcoin users and DeFi traders. The presence of investor logos and a bug bounty program indicates some level of funding and commitment to security. The company leverages partnerships with protocols like Alex, Arkadiko, and Velar. The absence of direct contact information may limit some trust but is common in crypto projects. Marketing efforts include active social media channels and content on Medium.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern security practices such as a bug bounty program, which is a positive indicator of security maturity. However, the lack of visible security headers, absence of a dedicated security policy, and no incident response contact reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. The platform should enhance transparency around security and incident handling to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bitflow Foundation

Description:

The decentralized exchange for Bitcoiners. Bitflow Foundation supports the governance and growth of the Bitflow DeFi Protocol.

Key Services:
Decentralized exchange for Bitcoin and related assetsDEX aggregator across multiple Stacks DEXs and liquidity poolsYield earning on BTC depositsUpcoming BTC borrowing using stSTX collateral
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsVercel AnalyticsKlaviyoMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Stacks blockchain
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Bug bounty program for vulnerability reporting

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Vercel AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag ManagerKlaviyo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
KlaviyoMicrosoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
Klaviyo
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and modern design

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

20/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 87 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns0.wixdns.netDNS only
ns1.wixdns.netDNS only
MX Records:
50: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
40: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2022040405, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:122ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. It integrates analytics tools such as Vercel Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Klaviyo for marketing and user behavior tracking. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a fintech/DeFi platform, with no visible technical debt or performance issues. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers.
Analyze Another Website