Skip to main content

Is bitninja.io a Scam? Security Check Results - BitNinja Security Reviews

bitninja.io favicon

Is bitninja.io Safe? Security Analysis for BitNinja Security

Check if bitninja.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPress 6.8.2Oxygen BuilderjQuery 3.7.1Google Tag ManagerAmplitude Analytics+4 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:46:53 AM
75
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

BitNinja Security is a technology company specializing in AI-powered server security solutions focused on Linux servers. Their platform offers a centralized dashboard with features such as malware scanning, IP reputation management, web application firewall, and spam detection. The company appears to target IT professionals, hosting providers, and server administrators seeking advanced security tools. The website is built on WordPress using Oxygen Builder and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools with a strong emphasis on user consent and privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Overall, the site reflects a professional and credible business with room to improve transparency around privacy and security policies.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Oxygen BuilderjQuery 3.7.1Google Tag ManagerAmplitude AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityHotjarCookiebotOptiMonk

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

BitNinja operates in the cybersecurity technology sector, providing AI-enhanced server protection services. Their business model is B2B SaaS/security software, targeting enterprises and hosting providers. The domain age of 19 years supports a mature market presence. The company leverages multiple analytics and marketing platforms to optimize user engagement and conversion. However, contact information and formal policy disclosures are not readily visible, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The use of Cloudflare and Cookiebot indicates a commitment to performance and privacy. No suspicious domains or partners were identified in the HTML content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited status to protect domain ownership. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, no explicit security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure is published. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. The site uses multiple tracking and analytics services, which are disclosed via consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers were not explicitly found in the provided data, suggesting an area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with more transparency and technical hardening.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

BitNinja Security

Description:

A server security suite with centralized dashboard containing an AI-powered Linux malware scanner, robust IP reputation, WAF, Spam Detection.

Key Services:
AI-powered Linux malware scannerIP reputation managementWeb Application Firewall (WAF)Spam detection
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Oxygen BuilderjQuery 3.7.1Google Tag ManagerAmplitude AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityHotjarCookiebotOptiMonk
Frameworks:
WordPress CMSOxygen Builder framework
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsAmplitudeMicrosoft ClarityHotjar
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via GTM)AmplitudeMicrosoft ClarityHotjar
Marketing Tools:
OptiMonkCookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern analytics and marketing tools with consent mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

75/100
Score

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.elasticemail.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.mailersend.net include:14555117.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:bitninja.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/23/2025 (77 days)
SANs:bitninja.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(264 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.135.42, 162.159.134.42
AAAA Records:2606:4700:7::a29f:872a, 2606:4700:7::a29f:862a
Name Servers:
gordon.ns.cloudflare.com
mary.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2379716577, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.elasticemail.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.mailersend.net include:14555117.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Oxygen Builder, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Amplitude, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Cookiebot, and OptiMonk. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. Accessibility is basic but present. No critical technical issues were detected, though enabling DNSSEC and security headers would strengthen the infrastructure.
Analyze Another Website