Skip to main content

Is blast.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf Reviews

blast.io favicon

Is blast.io Safe? Security Analysis for Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Check if blast.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIcelandmedium
Next.jsReactCloudflare DNSJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:54:58 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Blast.io operates as a technology-driven DeFi platform focused on providing users with yield on USD deposits and incentives for holding Blast tokens. The platform targets cryptocurrency users and investors, offering a mobile app and developer tools to enhance user engagement and ecosystem growth. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure leveraging Next.js and React, hosted likely behind Cloudflare, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and terms pages present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the platform presents a credible and professional front with a medium-sized user base and a domain age supporting legitimacy.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactCloudflare DNSJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Blast.io positions itself in the competitive DeFi market by offering attractive APY rates and token-based incentives, appealing to crypto-savvy users. The business model revolves around decentralized finance yield generation and token utility, supported by a growing user base of approximately 2 million users and $700 million deposited. The company leverages partnerships and community engagement via social media channels like Twitter and Discord. The use of privacy protection in domain registration aligns with industry norms for crypto businesses, balancing transparency and security. The platform's growth potential is supported by its developer tools and bridge services, indicating a strategy focused on ecosystem expansion.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protections, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and no incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits external security collaboration. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

Description:

Blast is a platform offering a fullstack chain solution with a focus on earning APY on USD deposits, targeting crypto users and holders of Blast tokens.

Key Services:
USD deposit yieldBlast token incentivesMobile app for platform accessBridge and developer tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactCloudflare DNSJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
WebMobile (app available)
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:re+6f7a401a48e1@inbound.dmarcdigests.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1042 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
drew.ns.cloudflare.com
leia.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382040186, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:58ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Blast.io utilizes a modern web stack with Next.js and React, ensuring a performant and responsive user experience across devices. Hosting appears to be managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS services that enhance speed and security. The website is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and accessibility features. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based site. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and images. Technical risks include the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to certain attack vectors. Overall, the technical implementation is robust but can be improved with additional security configurations.
Analyze Another Website