Skip to main content

Is bleu255.com a Scam? Security Check Results - bleu255.com Reviews

B

Is bleu255.com Safe? Security Analysis for BLEU255 - First in First out Since 1999

Check if bleu255.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3Monospace font styling
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:48:53 AM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website bleu255.com serves as a personal or collective project hub, emphasizing free software, personal directories, and archival content. It links to various related projects and software repositories, targeting a general audience interested in open-source and experimental publishing. The domain is well aged, dating back to 1999, consistent with the website's stated history. Technically, the site is a simple static HTML page with minimal styling and no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. Hosting and DNS are managed via Porkbun LLC, with no DNSSEC enabled. Security posture is minimal, lacking security headers and privacy or cookie policies. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and compliance. No analytics or advertising technologies are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the site is safe, with no adult or questionable content detected.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3Monospace font styling

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The site appears to be a small-scale personal or community project rather than a commercial business. It does not provide direct business services or products but acts as a portal to related projects and software. The business model is unclear but likely non-commercial or community-driven. The target audience includes software developers, researchers, and enthusiasts interested in free software and experimental publishing. The partnership with servus.at for computational resources suggests collaboration within a niche technical community. There are no clear revenue streams or formal market positioning. The lack of contact information and policies indicates a low level of formal business operations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low. The site uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but no security headers or DNSSEC are implemented. There is no privacy or cookie policy, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, but the absence of modern security practices and policies is a concern for compliance and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be a personal or collective project hub showcasing links to various related projects, software selections, personal directories, and archives. It emphasizes free software and community contributions.

Key Services:
link aggregation to related projectshosting free software repositoriesproviding personal directoriesarchival services
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3Monospace font styling
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a simple, static personal or collective project hub.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'default' uses 744-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:193.170.194.196 a:borok.bleu255.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(744-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:193.170.194.196
Name Servers:
curitiba.ns.porkbun.comDNS only
fortaleza.ns.porkbun.comDNS only
maceio.ns.porkbun.comDNS only
salvador.ns.porkbun.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: inbox.bleu255.com
SOA:Serial: 2372379323, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:34ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:193.170.194.196 a:borok.bleu255.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is a static HTML page with simple CSS styling and no detected JavaScript or frameworks. It uses monospace fonts and a minimalistic design. The site is hosted with DNS managed by Porkbun LLC, but DNSSEC is not enabled. There is no CMS or dynamic content platform detected. Performance is likely moderate given the simplicity, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of meta tags beyond charset and title. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal technical complexity and low technical debt but also limited modernization.
Analyze Another Website