Is blinker.com Safe? Security Analysis for Blinker
Check if blinker.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Blinker is an online platform focused on providing secure and convenient services for buying, selling, financing, and protecting cars. The website positions itself as a digital marketplace targeting consumers interested in automotive transactions. The technical infrastructure is built using Framer CMS and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing insights. While the design quality and user experience are good, the site lacks critical privacy and security documentation such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and security headers, which impacts its overall security posture. No contact information or forms were detected, limiting direct communication channels. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Blinker operates in the transportation sector as a medium-sized business providing automotive marketplace services. Its business model revolves around facilitating car transactions and financing digitally, targeting individual consumers. The platform leverages modern web technologies but lacks comprehensive trust signals such as certifications or detailed company information on the site. The absence of contact details and policies may affect customer confidence and regulatory compliance. The company appears to be US-based with consistent domain registration data. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the available data. The business could benefit from expanding transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen market position and customer trust.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The current security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of security headers, lack of visible privacy and cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking without clear privacy compliance mechanisms. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk from input-based vulnerabilities. The WHOIS data is consistent and does not raise suspicion. To improve security maturity, the company should implement standard security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and provide clear security incident contacts. Regular security assessments and compliance audits are recommended.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Blinker
Blinker puts the power to securely buy, sell, finance, and protect your car in the palm of your hand.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
0Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website uses Framer as CMS and design platform.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
MTA-STS Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 42 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Potential Subdomain Takeover
HIGHSubdomain api.blinker.com points to unregistered service production-public-nomad-proxy-1687957710.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings