Is blockchaincapital.com Safe? Security Analysis for Blockchain Capital
Check if blockchaincapital.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Blockchain Capital is a venture capital firm specializing in investments in blockchain and cryptocurrency startups since 2013. The company positions itself as a partner to crypto builders, offering venture funding, portfolio management, and research services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting investors and blockchain entrepreneurs. The technical infrastructure is built on Webflow CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and CDN hosting, providing a moderate to good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking a cookie consent mechanism. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could enhance security and compliance transparency.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Blockchain Capital operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on venture capital investments in the blockchain ecosystem. Their business model revolves around funding early to growth-stage crypto startups and managing a portfolio of high-profile blockchain companies. The firm maintains a strong market position with a history dating back to 2013 and a visible presence through blogs, fund reviews, and social media channels. The company leverages partnerships and dedicated portals for investors and job seekers, indicating a mature operational structure. Revenue streams likely include management fees and carried interest from investment funds. The target customer segments include crypto entrepreneurs, institutional investors, and blockchain developers. Strategic observations highlight the firm's emphasis on transparency and thought leadership, though domain registration inconsistencies warrant attention.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. However, the lack of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite cookie usage may pose compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a financial services website but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and enhancing compliance documentation.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Blockchain Capital
Partners to crypto builders since 2013.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No vulnerable libraries detected
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed and content rich.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, banking, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 72 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings