Skip to main content

Is blocksandfiles.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Situation Publishing Reviews

blocksandfiles.com favicon

Is blocksandfiles.com Safe? Security Analysis for Situation Publishing

Check if blocksandfiles.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT) for ads+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:11:03 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Blocks and Files is a specialized online media publisher focusing on storage and file system news, operated by Situation Publishing since 2013. The website targets technology professionals and enthusiasts interested in storage technologies, offering news articles, industry analysis, and newsletters. The business model is centered on digital publishing with advertising revenue streams. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common SEO and analytics plugins, hosted with Cloudflare services, and uses Google Ad Manager for advertising. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT) for adsjQueryWPBakery Page Builder

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website occupies a niche position in the technology media sector, focusing exclusively on storage and file system news. It leverages partnerships with related technology news sites such as The Register, DevClass, and The Next Platform, enhancing its content ecosystem. The business model relies on content publishing and advertising, supported by Google Ad Manager and analytics tools. The target audience includes IT professionals, storage vendors, and technology enthusiasts. The company, Situation Publishing, appears to be a small but established entity with a focused market presence. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and improving compliance and security transparency to build greater trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration includes clientTransferProhibited status, reducing risk of unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are recommended best practices. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. The site uses common third-party scripts including Google Analytics and ad services, which require careful privacy management. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing additional security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Situation Publishing

Description:

Where Storage Lives

Key Services:
Technology news articlesIndustry analysisNewsletter subscription
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Publisher Tags (GPT) for adsjQueryWPBakery Page Builder
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ad ManagerDoubleClick
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional technology news portal focused on storage and file systems.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

50/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(298 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:35.234.148.153
Name Servers:
dahlia.ns.cloudflare.com
gerald.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2382253049, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:69ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform using popular plugins like Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and uses Google Ad Manager for advertising, reflecting a modern digital marketing stack. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data, enhancing search engine visibility and social media sharing. Performance appears moderate with standard external resource loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve privacy compliance documentation.
Analyze Another Website