Skip to main content

Is bloomberg.co.kr a Scam? Security Check Results - bloomberg.co.kr Reviews

B

Is bloomberg.co.kr Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied

Check if bloomberg.co.kr is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
PerimeterXRoboto fontJavaScript
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:18:41 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.bloomberg.co.kr is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) challenge page that blocks all content until a captcha is solved. The domain appears unregistered or inactive based on the Korean WHOIS registry response, which states the host name is not registered. Consequently, no business information, contact details, or policies are available for analysis. The technical infrastructure is minimal and limited to PerimeterX security scripts and Google Fonts. The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of access, but the presence of a WAF indicates some level of protection against automated threats. Overall, the site is not operational or publicly accessible, resulting in a very low trust and credibility score.

Detected Technologies

PerimeterXRoboto fontJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the current content as the domain is unregistered and the website is blocked by a security challenge. There is no evidence of business operations, market positioning, or services. The domain name suggests an association with Bloomberg, but no official affiliation or content is present. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is characterized by the use of PerimeterX WAF, which provides bot mitigation and access control. However, the lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of SSL/TLS configuration, security headers, or data protection practices. No privacy or incident response policies are visible. The domain's unregistered status raises concerns about legitimacy and operational security.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register the domain properly and maintain accurate WHOIS records to improve legitimacy and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

PerimeterX Detected

The page is blocked by PerimeterX WAF with a captcha challenge requiring user interaction to proceed.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

px-captcha

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PerimeterXRoboto fontJavaScript
Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PerimeterX
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully blocked by PerimeterX WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:69.184.0.0/13 ip4:199.172.169.0/24 ip4:208.22.56.0/24 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@dmarc-bloomberg.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc-ruf@dmarc-bloomberg.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.bloomberg.co.kr
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:4/18/2026 (225 days)
SANs:www.bloomberg.co.kr, www-bloomberg-co-kr.shared.bloomberga.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:15.197.146.156, 3.33.146.110
Name Servers:
dns1.p01.nsone.netDNS only
dns2.p01.nsone.netDNS only
dns3.p01.nsone.netDNS only
dns4.p01.nsone.netDNS only
pdns1.ultradns.netDNS only
pdns3.ultradns.orgDNS only
pdns5.ultradns.infoDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2016040584, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:415ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:69.184.0.0/13 ip4:199.172.169.0/24 ip4:208.22.56.0/24 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website relies on PerimeterX for bot protection and uses Google Fonts for typography. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. The page is a static captcha challenge with no SEO metadata or structured data. Mobile optimization is basic due to minimal content. Performance and accessibility cannot be fully assessed due to content blocking. The technical implementation is minimal and primarily focused on security challenge delivery.
Analyze Another Website