Skip to main content

Is bloombergchina.com a Scam? Security Check Results - bloombergchina.com Reviews

B

Is bloombergchina.com Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied

Check if bloombergchina.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
PerimeterXJavaScript
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:13:36 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.bloombergchina.com is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page that requires captcha verification to proceed. This prevents access to any meaningful content or business information. The WHOIS lookup for the domain returned no registration data, indicating the domain may be unregistered, newly registered, or privacy protected. No metadata, structured data, or contact information is available to assess the business or compliance posture. Technically, the site uses PerimeterX for bot mitigation but lacks visible security headers or SSL configuration details. Overall, the site’s security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to access restrictions, but the lack of WHOIS data and business transparency raises legitimacy concerns.

Detected Technologies

PerimeterXJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible content and WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. The domain name suggests an affiliation with Bloomberg China, but no evidence supports this claim. There are no visible trust indicators, certifications, or contact details. The site appears to be either inactive or protected by aggressive security controls, limiting any competitive or market positioning analysis.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is difficult to assess fully because the site is blocked by a PerimeterX WAF captcha challenge. While this indicates some level of security awareness, the lack of visible HTTPS confirmation, security headers, or privacy policies is concerning. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust evaluation. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site’s security score is low due to these factors.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to ensure secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is blocked by a security mechanism using PerimeterX WAF with a captcha challenge preventing access to content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PerimeterXJavaScript

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PerimeterX
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to a PerimeterX captcha challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@dmarc-bloomberg.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc-ruf@dmarc-bloomberg.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.bloomberglp.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:10/2/2026 (392 days)
SANs:www.bloomberglp.com, go.bloomberg.com, www.bloomberg.com.br +37 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(249 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.146.110, 15.197.146.156
Name Servers:
dns1.p01.nsone.net
dns2.p01.nsone.net
dns3.p01.nsone.net
dns4.p01.nsone.net
pdns1.ultradns.net
pdns3.ultradns.org
pdns5.ultradns.info
SOA:Serial: 2016031604, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website’s technical infrastructure includes PerimeterX for bot and security management, indicated by multiple scripts and captcha challenges. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The page is minimal HTML with no metadata beyond a basic description and title indicating access denial. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features and does not provide any structured data or forms.
Analyze Another Website