Skip to main content

Is bloombergneweconomy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - bloombergneweconomy.com Reviews

B

Is bloombergneweconomy.com Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied

Check if bloombergneweconomy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
PerimeterXGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 6:20:21 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.bloombergneweconomy.com is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX bot mitigation challenge that blocks all content until human verification is completed. This prevents any meaningful extraction of business, contact, or security information from the site. The WHOIS query returned no match for the domain, indicating that the domain may be unregistered or protected by privacy services, which further limits trust and legitimacy assessment. The site uses PerimeterX technology for bot protection and Google Fonts for typography, but no other technologies or CMS platforms are detectable. Due to the lack of accessible content and metadata, the website's business model, market position, and services cannot be determined. Security posture is limited to the presence of PerimeterX protection, but no SSL or security headers information is available. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility due to the blocking mechanism and lack of WHOIS data.

Detected Technologies

PerimeterXGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the site as no content, contact information, or company details are accessible. The domain's WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about registration legitimacy. No partner or subsidiary domains are identified. The site appears to be protected by advanced bot mitigation technology, possibly indicating a high-value or sensitive business, but this cannot be confirmed.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is partially positive due to the use of PerimeterX bot mitigation, which helps prevent automated attacks and scraping. However, the lack of visible SSL/TLS information, security headers, and public security policies limits the assessment. The inability to access the site content prevents evaluation of vulnerabilities or compliance with data protection regulations. The domain's WHOIS absence is a negative indicator for trust. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not detectable.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Allow legitimate human users to access the website content to enable full security and business analysis.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

PerimeterX Detected

Page content is blocked by PerimeterX bot mitigation challenge requiring human verification.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PerimeterXGoogle Fonts
Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of PerimeterX bot mitigation

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to PerimeterX bot challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=_spf.main.dmarc-bloomberg.com
DNS Lookups:0/10
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@dmarc-bloomberg.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc-ruf@dmarc-bloomberg.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.bloombergneweconomy.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:5/7/2026 (244 days)
SANs:www.bloombergneweconomy.com, bloombergneweconomy.com, live.bloombergneweconomy.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.1.73, 151.101.129.73, 151.101.193.73, 151.101.65.73
Name Servers:
dns1.p01.nsone.netDNS only
dns2.p01.nsone.netDNS only
dns3.p01.nsone.netDNS only
dns4.p01.nsone.netDNS only
pdns1.ultradns.netDNS only
pdns3.ultradns.orgDNS only
pdns5.ultradns.infoDNS only
SOA:Serial: 94, TTL: 1200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:73ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=_spf.main.dmarc-bloomberg.com

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website employs PerimeterX for bot mitigation and Google Fonts for typography. No CMS or hosting provider information is detectable. The site is currently inaccessible, preventing performance and SEO analysis. Mobile optimization appears basic due to responsive CSS for the challenge page. The lack of metadata and structured data indicates minimal SEO implementation. The blocking mechanism severely limits technical assessment and indicates a high-security posture focused on bot prevention.
Analyze Another Website