Skip to main content

Is bluebox.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Blue Box Reviews

bluebox.lv favicon

Is bluebox.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Blue Box

Check if bluebox.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviamedium
jQuery 2.2.4Fancybox3BannerplayResponsiveVideosMozello CMS (inferred from URLs and scripts)+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:54:28 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Blue Box is a Latvian-based solarium studio chain offering tanning services and related cosmetic products across multiple locations in Latvia. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service listings and active social media presence. The technical infrastructure leverages Mozello CMS, Amazon CloudFront CDN, and common JavaScript libraries, providing a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though advanced security headers are missing. Privacy policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and suitable for its target audience.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.4Fancybox3BannerplayResponsiveVideosMozello CMS (inferred from URLs and scripts)Google Analytics (gtag.js)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Blue Box holds a strong market position as the largest solarium studio chain in Latvia, targeting consumers seeking tanning and skin care services. Their business model combines physical retail studios with cosmetic product sales and loyalty programs. The company maintains active engagement through social media channels and offers multiple studio locations, indicating medium business size. The website content and structure support clear navigation and service promotion, though explicit contact details are limited. Marketing tools like Google Analytics and Engaga are used for user engagement and analytics. The lack of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the business credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no explicit incident response or security policy information available. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls and clearer security contact information to improve incident response readiness and trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Blue Box

Description:

Blue Box is a Latvian solarium studio chain offering tanning services and related cosmetic products across multiple locations in Latvia.

Key Services:
Solarium tanning servicesSale of tanning and skin care cosmeticsBonus card loyalty program
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.2.4Fancybox3BannerplayResponsiveVideosMozello CMS (inferred from URLs and scripts)Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Engaga
Marketing Tools:
Engaga
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:bluebox.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/14/2025 (45 days)
SANs:bluebox.lv, *.bluebox.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.112.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.32.1, 104.21.48.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.96.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001
Name Servers:
maya.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
renan.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
50: mail.elva1.lv
SOA:Serial: 2376094230, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:104ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern but common technology stack including jQuery, Fancybox, and Mozello CMS hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta description and canonical tags present. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses Google Analytics and Engaga for analytics and marketing. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but updating libraries and adding security headers would improve the technical robustness.
Analyze Another Website