Skip to main content

Is bluecrossnc.com a Scam? Security Check Results - bluecrossnc.com Reviews

B

Is bluecrossnc.com Safe? Security Analysis for 406 Not Acceptable

Check if bluecrossnc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareN/alarge
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 6:34:26 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website bluecrossnc.com currently returns an HTTP 406 Not Acceptable error page with minimal HTML content, indicating that the site content is inaccessible or blocked. Due to this, no meaningful metadata, business information, or security policies are available for analysis. The domain is registered with Network Solutions, LLC since 2011, showing a stable and legitimate registration history. However, the lack of accessible content prevents a full assessment of the company's digital presence, security posture, and compliance status. The absence of HTTPS and security headers information further limits the security evaluation. Overall, the site appears to be down or misconfigured, which poses a risk to user trust and business operations.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Based on the domain and WHOIS data, the entity behind bluecrossnc.com is likely a large healthcare organization established in 2011. The domain registration is consistent and long-term, suggesting a stable business presence. However, the lack of accessible website content and absence of business details such as contact information, policies, or certifications limits insights into market positioning, competitive advantages, or operational strategies. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the provided data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the inaccessible website content. No security headers or HTTPS configuration details were provided. The domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, which is a positive indicator against unauthorized transfers. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a potential security improvement area. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available. The site should implement HTTPS, security headers, and publish clear privacy and security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Restore website accessibility and resolve HTTP 406 error to enable content delivery.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns HTTP 406 Not Acceptable error with minimal HTML content indicating blocked or inaccessible content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to HTTP 406 error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:mzgkbf5r@ag.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(790 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.3.10, 151.101.67.10, 151.101.131.10, 151.101.195.10
Name Servers:
a.ns.bcbsnc.com
b.ns.bcbsnc.com
c.ns.bcbsnc.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: bluecrossnc-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2020101211, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:166ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The technical analysis is limited due to the lack of accessible content. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration period. No CMS, frameworks, or technologies could be detected from the HTML content, which only contains a minimal error page. No scripts, forms, or external links were found. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests technical debt in security configuration. Hosting provider details beyond the registrar are not available. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be assessed.
Analyze Another Website