Skip to main content

Is bna.com a Scam? Security Check Results - bna.com Reviews

B

Is bna.com Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied

Check if bna.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
PerimeterX
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:14:38 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.bloombergindustry.com is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) challenge that blocks access to its content. This prevents any meaningful extraction of business, contact, or policy information from the site. The domain WHOIS lookup returned no registration data, indicating either the domain is unregistered, privacy protected, or the WHOIS query failed. This raises concerns about the legitimacy or transparency of the domain registration. Technically, the site uses PerimeterX for bot mitigation and human verification, but no other technologies or CMS platforms could be identified due to the blocked content. Security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of a WAF indicates some level of security hardening. Overall, the site’s risk profile is elevated due to lack of accessible information and missing WHOIS data, limiting trust and compliance assessments.

Detected Technologies

PerimeterX

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocked content and missing WHOIS data, detailed business intelligence is unavailable. The domain name and partial metadata suggest the site is related to Bloomberg's industry-focused media services, likely targeting professionals in legal, regulatory, and business sectors. The business model presumably involves subscription-based access to industry news and analysis. However, no direct evidence from the site content or metadata confirms these assumptions. The lack of visible contact or policy information limits assessment of customer engagement and compliance maturity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs PerimeterX WAF technology to protect against automated threats and bots, indicating a proactive security approach. However, the absence of visible security headers, SSL configuration details, or incident response contacts limits the ability to evaluate comprehensive security maturity. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration information are red flags that reduce trust. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information is available. Overall, the security posture appears partial but cannot be fully validated due to content blocking.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Review and adjust WAF settings to allow legitimate user access and enable content crawling for analysis.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

PerimeterX Detected

Page is blocked by PerimeterX WAF with a human verification challenge preventing access to content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PerimeterX

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PerimeterX

Website Quality Assessment

Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to PerimeterX WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.main.dmarc-bloomberg.com include:_spf.qualtrics.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.bna.com include:spf-2248456.jmsend.com -all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Forensic Reports:dmarcalerts@bloombergindustry.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:bloombergindustry.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:6/18/2026 (286 days)
SANs:bloombergindustry.com, www.bloombergindustry.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:170.75.230.136
Name Servers:
ns1.bloombergindustry.netDNS only
ns1.bna.comDNS only
ns2.bloombergindustry.netDNS only
ns2.bna.comDNS only
ns3.bloombergindustry.netDNS only
ns3.bna.comDNS only
ns4.bloombergindustry.netDNS only
ns4.bna.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: mgcny1.bloomberg.com
5: mgcny2.bloomberg.com
5: mgcnj2.bloomberg.com
5: mgcnj1.bloomberg.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090301, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:196ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.main.dmarc-bloomberg.com include:_spf.qualtrics.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.bna.com include:spf-2248456.jmsend.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses PerimeterX for bot mitigation and human verification challenges, indicating advanced security controls. External resources include Google Fonts and PerimeterX CDN scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The site is currently inaccessible, preventing performance, SEO, or accessibility evaluation. The technical stack appears modern but is locked behind security controls that limit external analysis. There is an opportunity to improve transparency and accessibility while maintaining security.
Analyze Another Website