Skip to main content

Is bonsolutions.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - BON Solutions Reviews

bonsolutions.eu favicon

Is bonsolutions.eu Safe? Security Analysis for BON Solutions

Check if bonsolutions.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQuerySwiperSlick CarouselOwl CarouselMagnific Popup+5 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:49:11 PM
30
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

BON Solutions is a small architecture and design firm presenting a portfolio of projects including office, residential, and civil engineering designs. The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins and JavaScript libraries to enhance user experience and visual presentation. While the site is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, as well as explicit contact information, which impacts its compliance and trustworthiness. Security posture is basic with no advanced headers or incident response information visible. Overall, the site is safe and suitable for general audiences but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices.

Detected Technologies

jQuerySwiperSlick CarouselOwl CarouselMagnific PopupHammer.jsTweenMaxVivusWPBakery Page BuilderSlider Revolution

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets clients seeking architectural and design services, positioning itself as a niche provider in the design and civil engineering sectors. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on showcasing completed projects to attract potential clients. The presence of social media links indicates some marketing efforts, but the lack of detailed business information and contact details limits transparency. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The website content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a professional image.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS (implied) but lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue handling. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

BON Solutions

Description:

BON Solutions appears to be a design and architecture firm showcasing various projects including office, residential, civil engineering, and cultural complex designs.

Key Services:
Office DesignResidential DesignCivil Engineering
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuerySwiperSlick CarouselOwl CarouselMagnific PopupHammer.jsTweenMaxVivusWPBakery Page BuilderSlider Revolution
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs with http but no explicit HTTPS found in content, likely supported)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based architecture/design portfolio site.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

0/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

0/100
Score

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

NIS2 requires appropriate technical measures including encryption

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

No HTTPS Encryption

CRITICAL

Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: bonsolutions-eu.mail.protection.outlook.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:79.133.180.10
Name Servers:
ns1.adminvps.ruDNS only
ns2.adminvps.netDNS only
ns3.adminvps.ruDNS only
ns4.adminvps.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: bonsolutions-eu.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2022100413, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:213ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a variety of front-end libraries such as jQuery, Swiper, Slick, and Owl Carousel for interactive UI elements. The use of WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution indicates reliance on popular but sometimes heavy plugins, which may affect performance. The site shows moderate loading performance and good mobile responsiveness. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data.
Analyze Another Website