Skip to main content

Is booklistreader.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Booklist Publications Reviews

booklistreader.com favicon

Is booklistreader.com Safe? Security Analysis for Booklist Publications

Check if booklistreader.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Statesmedium
Google Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHATinyMCE editorBroadstreet AdsSlick Carousel+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 1:02:18 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Booklist Online is a reputable publication operated under the American Library Association, specializing in book reviews, educational resources, and media content for libraries and educators. The website serves a medium-sized audience with subscription-based services and advertising opportunities, positioning itself as a leader in the book discovery sector. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks, integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security, and uses advertising networks like Broadstreet Ads. The site is mobile-optimized with good design and navigation, though some accessibility and SEO improvements are possible. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and bot protection but lacks explicit security headers and published policies. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some legitimacy concerns but is mitigated by the strong affiliation with the American Library Association. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy for its target audience.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHATinyMCE editorBroadstreet AdsSlick CarouselMaterial UI components

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates within the media, education, and non-profit sectors, leveraging its affiliation with the American Library Association to maintain a strong market position. Its revenue streams likely include subscriptions, advertising, and sponsored content. The target customers are libraries, educators, and book enthusiasts. The company maintains active social media channels and offers webinars and newsletters to engage its audience. The lack of visible contact information on the analyzed page suggests a focus on digital engagement rather than direct customer support. The business model is sustainable with a clear niche and established brand presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA implemented to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The missing WHOIS data is a notable gap in domain transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Booklist Publications

Description:

Booklist Online is a publication of the American Library Association providing book reviews, magazines, webinars, and resources for libraries and schools.

Key Services:
Book reviewsMagazines (Booklist, Booklist Reader, Guide to Graphic Novels)Webinars and media contentNewslettersAdvertising opportunities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHATinyMCE editorBroadstreet AdsSlick CarouselMaterial UI components
Frameworks:
Ant Design IconsMaterial UI
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration for bot protection

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Broadstreet Ads
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content related to book reviews and library resources.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

77/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a: ip4:54.186.117.47 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+lfenpzmzxd8@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(43 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.43.163.47, 52.35.0.17
Name Servers:
ns-1167.awsdns-17.org
ns-1565.awsdns-03.co.uk
ns-459.awsdns-57.com
ns-877.awsdns-45.net
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2016120524, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:230ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a: ip4:54.186.117.47 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:amazonses.com include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack with React-like components, Material UI, and Ant Design icons. It integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager for analytics, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and Broadstreet Ads for monetization. The site loads external fonts and stylesheets from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading but could benefit from further optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility and SEO could be enhanced with better semantic markup and meta tags. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform.
Analyze Another Website