Skip to main content

Is bookwize.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Bookwize Reviews

bookwize.com favicon

Is bookwize.com Safe? Security Analysis for Bookwize

Check if bookwize.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityN/asmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+4 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 12:35:14 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bookwize is a specialized SaaS provider offering an integrated hotel booking engine, channel manager, and business intelligence tools aimed at hoteliers and hotel groups. The company positions itself as a technology enabler to optimize hotel revenue through data-driven insights and seamless booking management. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and modern web technologies, with good SEO and mobile optimization. Privacy and cookie compliance are well implemented with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CAPTCHA protections, though lacks published security policies or incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and business presence appear credible. Overall, Bookwize demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticshCaptchaslick sliderMaterial Design Iconic FontGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bookwize operates in the hospitality technology sector, targeting small to medium hotel businesses seeking to improve direct bookings and channel management efficiency. Their SaaS model integrates with over 120 OTAs, providing a competitive advantage in distribution reach. The company leverages business intelligence to offer actionable insights for revenue optimization. The presence of live demos and customer success stories indicates active marketing and client engagement. However, the lack of explicit company contact details and missing WHOIS data suggest a need for enhanced trust signals. Strategic partnerships appear limited to internal domains and major social platforms. Growth potential lies in expanding integrations and enhancing security transparency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses hCaptcha to protect forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, supporting compliance. However, no security policy or incident response information is published, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. The absence of security headers in the provided data suggests potential improvements in HTTP security configurations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, potentially impacting domain trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header protections.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bookwize

Description:

Bookwize is a ground-breaking hospitality e-commerce platform providing hoteliers with an array of features that help analyse customer behaviour to maximize performance and increase revenue.

Key Services:
Online hotel booking engineChannel manager connected to 120+ OTAsBusiness intelligence and revenue optimization tools
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticshCaptchaslick sliderMaterial Design Iconic FontGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of hCaptcha for forms

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 10% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none(10% enforcement)
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:authfail@bookwize.com
Forensic Reports:authfail@bookwize.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(28 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:88.198.15.14
Name Servers:
adrian.ns.cloudflare.com
vin.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: bookwize-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2379469018, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and hCaptcha. SEO is enhanced using Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The site uses slick sliders and Material Design icons for UI/UX. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and caching hints. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. However, no hosting provider information was found, and security headers are not evident. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics and social media integration. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be improved with enhanced security headers and hosting transparency.
Analyze Another Website