Skip to main content

Is boosj.com a Scam? Security Check Results - boosj.com Reviews

B

Is boosj.com Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if boosj.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherChinasmall
nginx
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 6:33:01 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website boosj.com is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page with minimal HTML content. This prevents any meaningful analysis of the site's business operations, content, or user engagement features. The domain is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. since 2006, indicating a long-standing registration consistent with a legitimate entity. However, the lack of accessible content and absence of metadata, forms, or contact information severely limits the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or technical maturity. The technical infrastructure appears to be hosted on Alibaba Cloud with nginx as the web server, but no further details on CMS, frameworks, or analytics are available. Security posture cannot be properly evaluated due to the blocked content, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers is noted. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility due to inaccessibility.

Detected Technologies

nginx

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the website content as it is inaccessible. The domain registration data suggests a China-based entity with a long domain age, but no company name, services, or market information is available. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators. The lack of contact information and policies further limits business credibility assessment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is indeterminate due to the 403 Forbidden error blocking access to the site. No security headers or SSL configuration details are provided. DNSSEC is not enabled. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar, which is a positive trust factor. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site should implement HTTPS, security headers, and publish privacy and security policies to improve security posture and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Investigate and resolve the 403 Forbidden error to allow public access to the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content indicating access is blocked or restricted. No specific WAF vendor challenge detected.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
nginx
SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000;includeSubdomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(440 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:60.12.69.211, 115.227.7.195, 117.148.130.3
Name Servers:
vip3.alidns.com
vip4.alidns.com
MX Records:
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
10: mxbiz2.qq.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073112, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:127ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on Alibaba Cloud with nginx as the web server. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics technologies are detected due to the blocked content. The domain is stable and long-standing. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be assessed. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers suggests room for technical security improvements. The site currently provides no metadata or structured data for SEO or social media integration.
Analyze Another Website