Is boris1993.com Safe? Security Analysis for Code Life - boris1993 的个人博客
Check if boris1993.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website www.boris1993.com is a personal technical blog authored by Boris Zhao, focusing on programming, technology, and personal life topics. It is built using the Hexo static site generator with the NexT.Pisces theme, incorporating modern web technologies and multiple analytics and advertising integrations. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and consistent branding. However, it lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, and no direct contact information is provided, which impacts its privacy compliance and business credibility scores. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, indicating either a very recent registration or privacy protection, which introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid technical foundation and content quality but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
This personal blog targets technology enthusiasts and developers interested in programming and technical insights. The business model is primarily content sharing without evident commercial transactions. The site links to multiple social media profiles, enhancing author visibility and engagement. Advertising through Google Adsense and tracking via multiple analytics platforms suggest monetization efforts. The presence of related subdomains indicates an ecosystem of related services or projects. The lack of formal business information and contact details limits the ability to assess market positioning or growth potential fully.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and uses a consent management platform for cookie compliance, reflecting good security hygiene. However, no explicit security headers like Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, and no security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy reduces transparency for security researchers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The overall security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Boris has arrived!
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Content Security Policy not explicitly detected
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of consent management platform for cookies
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a personal technical blog by Boris Zhao
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 44 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings