Skip to main content

Is bowlingroom.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Bowling Room Reviews

bowlingroom.com favicon

Is bowlingroom.com Safe? Security Analysis for Bowling Room

https://bowlingroom.com

Check if bowlingroom.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityGermanymedium
WordPressElementorJetEngineJetPopupJetThemeCore+7 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 9:28:37 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Bowling Room is a regional hospitality and entertainment business operating multiple venues in Germany, offering bowling, billiards, darts, and laser tag activities. The website targets local customers and promotes social and leisure activities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and several Jet plugins, integrating Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site implements cookie consent via Borlabs Cookie, indicating some privacy awareness. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks explicit security headers and a visible privacy policy. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness and raises questions about domain registration status. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved transparency and security hardening.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorJetEngineJetPopupJetThemeCoreJetTabsJetTricksGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerW3 Total CacheBorlabs CookieEmail Encoder Bundle

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bowling Room positions itself as a unique leisure destination in several German cities, focusing on group activities and events. Its business model revolves around hospitality services and entertainment, targeting families, friends, and local communities. The company leverages online reservations and social media marketing to engage customers. The absence of detailed WHOIS data and limited contact information online suggests a need for better corporate transparency. The use of modern web technologies and SEO practices indicates a digitally mature approach, though privacy and security compliance could be enhanced.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

m*****@bowlingroom.com

Phone Numbers (4)

026*******
026*******
065*******
023*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and has implemented cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive security and privacy indicators. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options weakens its defense against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, limiting the site's preparedness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data also impacts trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, publishing privacy policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy and other security headers to mitigate XSS and clickjacking risks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bowling Room

Description:

Bowling Room ist Freunde treffen und das Leben genießen. Beim Bowling, Billard & Dart oder der puren Lasertag-Action.Schön, dass du da bist!

Key Services:
BowlingBillardDartLasertagEvent hostingOnline reservation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorJetEngineJetPopupJetThemeCoreJetTabsJetTricksGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerW3 Total CacheBorlabs CookieEmail Encoder Bundle
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Borlabs Cookie
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based entertainment venue site with multiple locations in Germany.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:62.154.185.0/24 ip4:54.36.245.0/24 include:spf.messagingengine.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.aranes.de include:spf.easybill-mail.de ?all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:?all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(133 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:178.16.62.252
Name Servers:
ns35.domaincontrol.com
ns36.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
20: in2-smtp.messagingengine.com
10: in1-smtp.messagingengine.com
SOA:Serial: 2025070700, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:62.154.185.0/24 ip4:54.36.245.0/24 include:spf.messagingengine.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:_spf.aranes.de include:spf.easybill-mail.de ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor and Jet plugins, providing a rich user experience with video backgrounds and responsive design. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. Cookie consent is managed by Borlabs Cookie, indicating GDPR awareness. Performance is moderate with caching plugins in use. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site lacks some security headers and explicit privacy/legal pages, which are technical gaps. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and compliance.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about bowlingroom.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website