Skip to main content

Is brander.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Brander Reviews

brander.lv favicon

Is brander.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Brander

Check if brander.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
WordPressWooCommerceBootstrapjQueryGoogle Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:07:53 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Brander is a small Latvian company specializing in brand building and distribution of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages within the Baltic States. The website serves as an e-commerce platform showcasing a catalog of beverage brands and products, targeting both business clients and consumers interested in premium beverage offerings. The company positions itself as a regional distributor with a focus on brand management and market presence in the beverage sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging common web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery. It integrates marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with structured data and meta tags properly implemented. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and technical safeguards. The overall risk assessment suggests a legitimate business with a professional online presence but with some gaps in security and compliance transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and improving contact transparency to strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceBootstrapjQueryGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Brander operates in the retail sector focusing on beverage distribution and brand building in the Baltic region. Its competitive advantage lies in its curated portfolio of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverage brands and its regional market knowledge. The business model combines e-commerce with brand representation and distribution services. Revenue streams likely include product sales and brand partnership fees. The target customers include retailers, hospitality businesses, and end consumers seeking premium beverage products. The company maintains a social media presence on Facebook, supporting marketing efforts. Growth indicators are not explicit but the website's product catalog and marketing tools suggest active business operations. The partnership ecosystem is not detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Overall, Brander appears to be a focused regional player with a clear market niche.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

b*****@brander.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and preparedness signals. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels introduces privacy considerations that should be managed carefully. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated via privacy and cookie policies, but no data protection officer or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with enhanced technical controls and policy disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Brander

Description:

Brander is a brand building and distribution company of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages in Baltic States. We'll take care of your brand!

Key Services:
Brand buildingDistribution of alcoholic beveragesDistribution of non-alcoholic beverages
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceBootstrapjQueryGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Frameworks:
WooCommerceYoast SEO
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsJetpack Stats
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site focused on beverage distribution.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

48/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.105.203.99 +ip4:91.105.203.108 +ip4:91.105.203.93 +ip4:91.105.203.94 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:i8awixud@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:i8awixud@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

13 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:91.105.203.108
Name Servers:
ns1.colo.lvDNS only
ns2.colo.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: brander.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072001, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:199ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.105.203.99 +ip4:91.105.203.108 +ip4:91.105.203.93 +ip4:91.105.203.94 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses standard web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, though some optimization opportunities may exist. The site is mobile-friendly and accessible at a basic level. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technology stack is standard for small to medium e-commerce sites, providing a solid foundation but requiring ongoing maintenance to avoid technical debt and security risks.
Analyze Another Website