Skip to main content

Is brentex.ee a Scam? Security Check Results - Brentex OÜ Reviews

brentex.ee favicon

Is brentex.ee Safe? Security Analysis for Brentex OÜ

Check if brentex.ee is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationFinlandsmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryLeaflet.js+2 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 1:01:07 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Brentex OÜ is a specialized manufacturer of welded trailers based in Estonia with a strong presence in Finland, operating since 2000. The company focuses on durable, professional-grade trailers and related accessories, serving both business and individual customers through direct sales and a reseller network. Their website reflects a solid market position with clear product categorization and reseller support. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the business appears legitimate and professional, but improvements in privacy and security transparency are recommended.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryLeaflet.jsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets transportation and logistics sectors needing reliable trailers. Their business model combines manufacturing with accessory sales and reseller partnerships. The website supports customer engagement with detailed product info, reseller maps, and contact personnel. The presence of multiple reseller locations across Finland indicates a broad distribution network. Brentex's competitive advantage lies in their product durability and over 20 years of industry experience. The company leverages digital marketing tools but lacks full privacy compliance, which could impact customer trust. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating a focused business structure.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (10)

m*****@brentex.fi
m*****@alberni.fi
j*****@jt-asunmaa.fi
k*****@aland.net
j*****@konejonnit.fi
+5 more emails found

Phone Numbers (10)

+3584004*****
+3585030*****
+3585030*****
040*******
+3584002*****
+5 more numbers found

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and standard tracking scripts but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, policies, and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Brentex OÜ

Description:

Brentex OÜ is an Estonian trailer manufacturer operating since 2000, specializing in welded trailers designed for professional use. They offer complete solutions including trailers and accessories, focusing on durability, customer needs, usability, aesthetics, and safety.

Key Services:
Manufacture of welded trailersSales of trailer accessories and spare partsReseller network support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryLeaflet.jsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.zone.eu include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:217.146.69.29
Name Servers:
ns.zone.euDNS only
ns2.zone.eeDNS only
ns3.zonedata.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: brentex-ee.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024060323, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.zone.eu include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with a tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Leaflet.js for maps, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modern CMS adoption and enhanced accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website