Skip to main content

Is brevis.network a Scam? Security Check Results - Brevis Reviews

brevis.network favicon

Is brevis.network Safe? Security Analysis for Brevis

Check if brevis.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
React.jsGSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)CSS3JavaScript
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:21:49 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Brevis Network is a technology company specializing in providing advanced blockchain data processing solutions, including products such as Pico zkVM, zkCoprocessor, and Incentra. The platform targets developers and blockchain users seeking zero-trust omnichain data access and processing capabilities. Positioned as an innovative player in the blockchain technology sector, Brevis emphasizes secure and scalable smart contract data handling. The website reflects a modern, developer-focused approach with clear product offerings and community engagement channels.

Detected Technologies

React.jsGSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)CSS3JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Brevis Network operates within the blockchain technology industry, focusing on developer tools and infrastructure. Its business model revolves around offering proprietary products that enhance smart contract capabilities across multiple chains. The presence of ecosystem partners like Celer Network, PancakeSwap, and MetaMask suggests strategic alliances that strengthen its market position. The company targets a niche audience of blockchain developers and enterprises requiring advanced cryptographic and data processing solutions. Growth indicators include active community channels and comprehensive product documentation, although public business details remain limited.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a Content-Security-Policy header, indicating a baseline security posture. However, additional security headers are absent, and there is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which are important for compliance and user trust. The lack of direct contact information for security incidents or vulnerability disclosures limits incident response readiness. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, transparency, and formal policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Brevis

Description:

Access and process omnichain data in smart contracts with zero trust

Key Services:
Pico zkVMzkCoprocessorIncentraExplorer
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React.jsGSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)CSS3JavaScript
Frameworks:
React
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.60.5
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-a1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-a2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-a3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-a4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 37, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:46ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using React.js with GSAP for animations, hosted partially on Amazon S3 for static assets. The technical implementation is modern and supports good mobile responsiveness and user experience. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in SEO and accessibility. The site lacks CMS indicators, suggesting a custom or static site approach. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but security headers and privacy compliance features are minimal. Opportunities exist to improve SEO metadata, accessibility features, and security configurations to enhance overall technical maturity.
Analyze Another Website