Skip to main content

Is brid.gy a Scam? Security Check Results - brid.gy Reviews

brid.gy favicon

Is brid.gy Safe? Security Analysis for Bridgy

Check if brid.gy is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSS (Bootstrap)JavaScript
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:48:50 AM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bridgy is a specialized technology service that connects users' websites to various social media platforms, enabling functionalities such as likes, reposts, mentions, and cross-posting. It serves a niche audience primarily composed of web developers, bloggers, and social media users interested in IndieWeb standards and decentralized social media integration. The platform is open source and integrates with multiple social networks, positioning itself as a trusted tool within its community. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including HTML5, Bootstrap CSS, and JavaScript, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and secure form submissions, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no contact information is provided, which may impact user trust. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS (Bootstrap)JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bridgy operates in the technology sector, focusing on social media integration services that cater to the IndieWeb community and developers seeking to bridge their websites with social platforms. Its business model revolves around providing free or open source tools that facilitate social interactions and content syndication. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like GitHub and IndieWeb.org to enhance credibility and community engagement. The lack of explicit business registration or contact details suggests a small-scale operation, likely maintained by individual developers or a small team. The open source nature and community ties provide competitive advantages in trust and innovation. Growth potential lies in expanding supported platforms and improving user experience. The ecosystem includes related domains such as snarfed.org and GitHub, which support development and user engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS usage and secure form submission methods. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, while the site is not evidently vulnerable, it lacks several best practices that would enhance security posture and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Connects your web site to social media. Likes, reposts, mentions, cross-posting, and more.

Key Services:
Social media connectionLikes, reposts, mentions trackingCross-postingWebmention integration
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS (Bootstrap)JavaScript
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by og:url https://brid.gy/)
  • Secure form POST methods

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=16070400; preload"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:brid.gy
Issuer:WR3
Valid Until:11/2/2025 (57 days)
SANs:brid.gy

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:216.239.38.21, 216.239.32.21, 216.239.34.21, 216.239.36.21
AAAA Records:2001:4860:4802:32::15, 2001:4860:4802:36::15, 2001:4860:4802:34::15, 2001:4860:4802:38::15
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: spool.mail.gandi.net
50: fb.mail.gandi.net
SOA:Serial: 2, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:39ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, Bootstrap CSS framework, and JavaScript. It employs asynchronous and synchronous scripts for functionality and uses secure POST methods for form submissions. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements or errors. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including Open Graph tags for social media sharing. Accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. The technical stack is modern but minimalistic, reflecting a focused service offering without unnecessary complexity.
Analyze Another Website