Skip to main content

Is bridge.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Bridge Reviews

bridge.xyz favicon

Is bridge.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Bridge

Check if bridge.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
Webflow CMSJavaScriptLottie animationsSwiper.jsTrustArc cookie consent+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:46:43 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bridge.xyz is a fintech technology platform specializing in stablecoin infrastructure and APIs designed for developers and businesses to facilitate global money movement. The company offers a suite of services including stablecoin orchestration, issuance, wallet management, card issuance, and cross-border payments, positioning itself as a niche player in the stablecoin payments ecosystem. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and modern web technologies, targeting developers and enterprises seeking efficient stablecoin payment solutions. The platform leverages Webflow CMS, JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Lottie animations, and integrates tracking and consent tools like Google Tag Manager and TrustArc, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSJavaScriptLottie animationsSwiper.jsTrustArc cookie consentGoogle Tag ManagerApollo.io trackingMarker.io feedback tool

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bridge operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on B2B stablecoin payment infrastructure. Its business model revolves around providing APIs and infrastructure to enable quick, cost-effective, and seamless global money movement using stablecoins. The company targets developers and businesses requiring stablecoin orchestration and issuance capabilities. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and trust signals such as cookie consent and professional design. While direct contact details are limited, the presence of demo request forms suggests a sales-driven approach. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, and the domain age aligns with a credible fintech entity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options implemented. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms and tracking transparency tools indicates awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could enhance security transparency and incident handling readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bridge

Description:

A stablecoin platform built for developers. Enable quick, easy, and cost-effective global money movement that seamlessly integrates with your existing applications.

Key Services:
Stablecoin orchestrationStablecoin issuanceGlobal card issuanceWallet servicesCross-border payments
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSJavaScriptLottie animationsSwiper.jsTrustArc cookie consentGoogle Tag ManagerApollo.io trackingMarker.io feedback tool
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerApollo.io
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Apollo.ioMarker.io
Marketing Tools:
Apollo.ioMarker.io
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content rich for a fintech stablecoin platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:47053228.spf07.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(268 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.comWHOIS only
ns-cloud-d2.googledomains.comWHOIS only
ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.comWHOIS only
ns-cloud-d4.googledomains.comWHOIS only
ns13.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns14.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:77ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:47053228.spf07.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS with a modern JavaScript tech stack including Lottie animations and Swiper.js for interactive UI elements. It uses third-party services such as TrustArc for cookie consent, Google Tag Manager for analytics, Apollo.io for tracking, and Marker.io for feedback. Hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal, but the lack of some compliance documentation and direct contact info could impact trust and regulatory adherence.
Analyze Another Website