Skip to main content

Is brink.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - Brink Towing Systems B.V. Reviews

B

Is brink.eu Safe? Security Analysis for Brink Towing Systems B.V.

Check if brink.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationNetherlandsmedium
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityCookiebot
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:07:38 PM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Brink Towing Systems B.V. is a leading European manufacturer and distributor of towing systems, offering the largest assortment of tow bars in Europe. Their business model includes product sales and installation services through a network of partners, targeting vehicle owners across Europe. The website is professionally designed, localized in Dutch, and provides clear navigation and relevant content focused on towing products and services. The company demonstrates a strong market position within the transportation sector in the Netherlands.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityCookiebot

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company leverages partnerships for installation services, enhancing customer convenience and market reach. Their use of Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant consent management and integration of analytics tools like Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity indicates a mature digital marketing and compliance approach. The absence of explicit contact details on the main page suggests a focus on partner-driven customer interaction. The website's multilingual support and extensive product catalog reflect a broad European market strategy.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and employs Cookiebot for cookie consent, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations. However, explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options are not evident, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Brink Towing Systems B.V.

Description:

Brink offers the largest assortment of tow bars in Europe and provides installation services via partners.

Key Services:
Tow bar salesTow bar installation via partners
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft ClarityCookiebot
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityCookiebot
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:45.62.178.137 ip4:45.62.179.60 ip4:185.114.121.114 mx a include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.trustit.eu include:spf.afas.online include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.transsmart.com include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:9/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:02e76668dae0391@rep.dmarcanalyzer.com
Forensic Reports:02e76668dae0391@for.dmarcanalyzer.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.brink.eu
Issuer:Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
Valid Until:12/12/2025 (70 days)
SANs:*.brink.eu, brink.eu

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:87.233.203.232
AAAA Records:2001:9a8:a6:0:87:233:203:232
Name Servers:
ns1-02.azure-dns.comDNS only
ns2-02.azure-dns.netDNS only
ns3-02.azure-dns.orgDNS only
ns4-02.azure-dns.infoDNS only
MX Records:
10: dexkoglobal.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:45.62.178.137 ip4:45.62.179.60 ip4:185.114.121.114 mx a include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.trustit.eu include:spf.afas.online include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.transsmart.com include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website utilizes modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Hosting and domain registration are managed by reputable providers. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant online presence but could be improved by adopting additional security headers and streamlining third-party dependencies.
Analyze Another Website