Skip to main content

Is briskpelican.io a Scam? Security Check Results - briskpelican.io Reviews

B

Is briskpelican.io Safe? Security Analysis for briskpelican.io

https://briskpelican.io

Check if briskpelican.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherIcelandsmall
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 4:24:15 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website briskpelican.io currently presents only a minimal HTML page containing a JSON error message indicating a missing API resource. There is no accessible business content, metadata, or structured data to describe the company, its services, or its market position. The domain is registered via NameCheap with privacy protection enabled, and DNS is hosted on Amazon AWS. The lack of content and contact information suggests the site is either under development or inactive. From a technical perspective, the site lacks any detectable CMS, frameworks, or analytics tools. No security headers or HTTPS information was found in the provided data, indicating a weak security posture. The minimal content and absence of privacy or cookie policies reflect poor privacy compliance and business credibility. Security evaluation highlights critical issues including missing HTTPS, no security headers, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. These gaps pose risks if the site were to handle sensitive data or user interactions. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, security, and compliance metrics, limiting trust and usability. Strategic recommendations include enabling HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding clear contact and incident response information, and improving website content and technical implementation to establish credibility and security.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of business content or metadata, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a small or new entity founded in 2019, but no company name, services, or market positioning is available. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS is common for small or early-stage businesses but limits transparency. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of contact details and policies indicates minimal operational maturity and market presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is weak. No HTTPS or SSL configuration details were provided, and no security headers were detected. The absence of privacy, cookie, or incident response policies indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or security framework adherence is evident. The site does not appear to implement best practices for protecting user data or responding to security incidents, representing a significant risk if the site becomes operational.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible or minimal, showing only a JSON error message indicating missing API resource.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(491 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:13.59.209.195, 3.12.92.90, 18.219.175.250
Name Servers:
ns-1305.awsdns-35.org
ns-2001.awsdns-58.co.uk
ns-324.awsdns-40.com
ns-925.awsdns-51.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:44ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a minimal HTML page with a JSON error message indicating a missing API endpoint. No CMS, JavaScript libraries, or frameworks are detected. DNS is managed via Amazon AWS name servers, and the domain is registered through NameCheap with privacy protection. The lack of HTTPS and security headers suggests outdated or incomplete technical implementation. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to minimal content. The site requires modernization and proper technical configuration to support secure and performant operations.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about briskpelican.io

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website