Skip to main content

Is broko.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Aon Baltic Latvijas filiāle Reviews

broko.lv favicon

Is broko.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Aon Baltic Latvijas filiāle

Check if broko.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviamedium
jQuerySlick CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDKCookieLaw.org consent script
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:15:56 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Broko.lv is an online insurance brokerage platform operated by Aon Baltic Latvijas filiāle, the largest insurance broker in the Baltic states. The website offers online comparison and purchase of auto, travel, and yacht insurance policies, targeting Latvian consumers seeking convenient and cost-effective insurance solutions. The platform emphasizes ease of use with online calculators and quick policy issuance. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel, integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, and uses HTTPS to secure communications. While the site lacks explicit advanced security headers and a published security policy, it demonstrates basic security best practices including form validation and no exposed sensitive data. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for an established insurance brokerage, though WHOIS data could not be verified due to query limits. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving accessibility features to strengthen security posture and compliance.

Detected Technologies

jQuerySlick CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDKCookieLaw.org consent script

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Broko.lv operates as a digital insurance broker under the Aon Baltic brand, focusing on the transportation insurance sector in Latvia. Its business model centers on providing online insurance price comparison and direct policy purchase, streamlining the customer journey. The company leverages its market position as the largest Baltic insurance broker to attract customers seeking competitive insurance offers. Revenue likely derives from commissions on insurance sales. The platform integrates with multiple insurance providers such as BTA, Ergo, Balta, and Compensa, indicating a broad partnership ecosystem. The website's content and design reflect a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a clear focus on the Latvian market. Growth indicators include recent customer purchase data displayed on the site, enhancing trust and engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@broko.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712206****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and client-side form validation implemented. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks that require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but would benefit from enhanced security controls and formalized policies to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Aon Baltic Latvijas filiāle

Description:

Auto un ceļojumu apdrošināšanas cenu kalkulatori online. Tā pati apdrošināšana tiešsaistē, lētāk un ērtāk. Pakalpojuma sniedzējs ir Aon Baltic Latvijas filiāle, kas ir lielākā apdrošināšanas brokeru kompānija Baltijas valstīs.

Key Services:
Auto insuranceTravel insuranceYacht insurance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuerySlick CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook SDKCookieLaw.org consent script
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form validation scripts present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook SDK
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com ip4:79.98.27.139 include:spf.aon.net a mx ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:aon@rua.agari.com
Forensic Reports:aon@ruf.agari.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:80.209.226.49
Name Servers:
ns1.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns2.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns3.serveriai.ltDNS only
ns4.serveriai.ltDNS only
MX Records:
10: Broko-lv.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024050200, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:46ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com ip4:79.98.27.139 include:spf.aon.net a mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a combination of jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components, with Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The site loads fonts and CSS from aon.lt subdomains, indicating integration with the parent company's resources. The HTML is well-structured with meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of fonts. Mobile optimization is good, with viewport meta tags and responsive design elements. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site uses custom JavaScript for form validation and user interaction. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve security and accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website