Skip to main content

Is brookenotonadiet.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Brooke: Not On a Diet Reviews

brookenotonadiet.com favicon

Is brookenotonadiet.com Safe? Security Analysis for Brooke: Not On a Diet

Check if brookenotonadiet.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsJetpackDisqus
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 9:13:42 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Brooke: Not On a Diet is a personal blog centered on fitness, health, and lifestyle topics, primarily targeting individuals interested in weight loss and healthy living. The site offers personal experiences, fitness challenges, and product recommendations through affiliate marketing. The business model is content-driven with monetization via ads and affiliate links. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with the Genesis Framework, utilizing common plugins such as Jetpack and Disqus, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS. Performance and mobile optimization are basic but functional. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is minimal with a basic privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data shows inconsistencies, with a future domain creation date and a drop-catching registrar, which reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the site is a small-scale personal blog with moderate technical and security maturity.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsJetpackDisqus

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website occupies a niche in personal health and fitness blogging, leveraging affiliate marketing and advertising for revenue. It targets health-conscious individuals seeking relatable content and fitness motivation. The blog maintains active community engagement through comments and social media channels. Partnerships with Amazon Associates and POPSUGAR Select indicate monetization strategies. The lack of formal business information and professional certifications aligns with its small-scale, personal nature. Growth potential depends on content quality and audience engagement. The site’s reliance on third-party services for analytics and advertising is typical for blogs of this size.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and content injection. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could allow DNS spoofing attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The site uses common third-party scripts and plugins, which should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-specific disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Brooke: Not On a Diet

Description:

A personal blog focused on fitness, health, lifestyle, and weight loss journey sharing personal experiences, challenges, and tips.

Key Services:
Fitness challengesHealth and wellness bloggingAffiliate product recommendationsCommunity engagement via blog comments and social media
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsJetpackDisqus
Frameworks:
Genesis Framework
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticscomScore
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsensePOPSUGAR Select
Tracking Pixels:
comScoreDisqus
Marketing Tools:
Jetpack
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal health and fitness blog with active content and community engagement.

πŸ›‘οΈSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

πŸ‘€GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

πŸ›‘οΈNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

πŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

πŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

35 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:brookenotonadiet.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/6/2025 (35 days)
SANs:brookenotonadiet.com, *.brookenotonadiet.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

πŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(245 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • β€’No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.11.137, 172.67.166.35
AAAA Records:2a06:98c1:3120::1, 2a06:98c1:3121::1
Name Servers:
marjory.ns.cloudflare.com
zac.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2376003576, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:127ms

⚑Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

πŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS using the Genesis Framework, with jQuery and several plugins such as Jetpack and Google Analyticator for analytics. It integrates third-party services including Disqus for comments and Amazon for affiliate marketing. Hosting is behind Cloudflare DNS, but no advanced CDN or performance optimization is evident. The site has basic mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with some external scripts that may impact load times. The WHOIS data inconsistency suggests possible domain registration issues or drop-catching, which should be clarified to avoid trust concerns.
Analyze Another Website