Skip to main content

Is brownjugalaska.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Brown Jug Reviews

brownjugalaska.net favicon

Is brownjugalaska.net Safe? Security Analysis for Brown Jug

Check if brownjugalaska.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailUnited Stateslarge
WordPressPHPjQueryLayerSliderElementor+7 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:47:48 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Brown Jug is a well-established retail liquor business operating primarily in Alaska, offering a wide selection of alcoholic beverages including wine, spirits, and beer. The company positions itself as the largest liquor selection provider in Alaska, targeting adult consumers with a business model focused on retail sales, membership clubs, and rural orders. The website reflects a mature digital presence with integrated e-commerce and marketing features.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryLayerSliderElementorMonsterInsightsGoogle reCAPTCHAAddThisInstagram Feed ProContact Form 7Cookie Law InfoUncode Theme

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company leverages partnerships with wine clubs and event sites to enhance customer engagement and expand its market reach. Its use of career portals and privacy hosting partners indicates a structured operational approach. The business targets adult consumers in Alaska with a large-scale retail footprint, supported by a professional website and active social media channels.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@brownjugak.com

Phone Numbers (1)

907*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and age verification to comply with legal requirements for alcohol sales. It uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR and CCPA. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests room for improvement in domain and web security. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating potential gaps in transparency and preparedness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Brown Jug

Description:

Alaska's largest selection of liquor from wine, spirits and beers

Key Services:
Retail liquor salesGrowler barWine clubRural ordersCareers
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryLayerSliderElementorMonsterInsightsGoogle reCAPTCHAAddThisInstagram Feed ProContact Form 7Cookie Law InfoUncode Theme
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Age verification gate for alcohol sales
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent with GDPR and CCPA compliance

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdSense
Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing Tools:
AddThis social sharingMonsterInsights Google Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses WordPress CMS with multiple plugins for SEO, social media, and security.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

No Name Servers Found

HIGH

Unable to find name servers for domain

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:8.36.41.54
SOA:Serial: 2025072404, TTL: 14400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using a modern tech stack including Elementor, LayerSlider, and various plugins for SEO, social media integration, and privacy compliance. Hosting is provided by Liquid Web, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking, balanced with user privacy controls. Technical debt appears low but security enhancements are recommended.
Analyze Another Website