Skip to main content

Is brownsugar.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Brown Sugar, LLC Reviews

brownsugar.com favicon

Is brownsugar.com Safe? Security Analysis for Brown Sugar, LLC

Check if brownsugar.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaUnited Statesmedium
HTML5CSS3Google Fonts (Montserrat, Roboto)
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:15:38 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Brown Sugar, LLC operates a media-related service under The E.W. Scripps Company umbrella, providing content restricted to U.S. viewers. The website analyzed is a minimal informational page indicating geo-restriction with no interactive or transactional features. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML and CSS with Google Fonts, and lacks advanced frameworks or CMS. The site is mobile responsive but lacks SEO and accessibility enhancements. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS verification, security headers, and privacy policies. No WHOIS data is available for the subdomain, limiting trust assessment. Overall, the site serves a narrow purpose with limited content and minimal digital maturity.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3Google Fonts (Montserrat, Roboto)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business is positioned as a media content provider with geographic restrictions, targeting U.S. residents. It operates under a known parent company, The E.W. Scripps Company, which lends credibility. The business model appears to be content distribution with regional access control. No direct revenue streams or customer engagement mechanisms are evident on this page. The lack of contact information and policies suggests a low level of direct customer interaction on this domain. The partnership ecosystem is not visible from this page. Growth indicators and competitive advantages cannot be assessed from the limited content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of WHOIS data for the subdomain reduces transparency. No forms or data collection points reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not demonstrated. The security culture appears minimal, with no visible trust or security certifications. The site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Brown Sugar, LLC

Description:

Brown Sugar is a service or product available only for viewing in the U.S., likely related to media or content distribution as part of The E.W. Scripps Company.

Key Services:
Content viewing restricted to U.S. region
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3Google Fonts (Montserrat, Roboto)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and serves as a geo-restriction notice.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 77 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:34.160.183.236
Name Servers:
ns-1175.awsdns-18.orgDNS only
ns-137.awsdns-17.comDNS only
ns-1680.awsdns-18.co.ukDNS only
ns-923.awsdns-51.netDNS only
MX Records:
5: mxa-0028be01.gslb.pphosted.com
5: mxb-0028be01.gslb.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:87ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML5 and CSS3 with Google Fonts for typography. There is no evidence of JavaScript frameworks, CMS, or analytics tools. The site is mobile responsive through CSS media queries but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No hosting provider or platform information is available. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and lack of heavy scripts. The absence of security headers and HTTPS verification is a technical risk. The site could benefit from modernization including CMS adoption, enhanced SEO, and security improvements.
Analyze Another Website