Skip to main content

Is browser-intake-datadoghq.com a Scam? Security Check Results - browser-intake-datadoghq.com Reviews

B

Is browser-intake-datadoghq.com Safe? Security Analysis for browser-intake-datadoghq.com

Check if browser-intake-datadoghq.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:33:46 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain browser-intake-datadoghq.com is registered and active since 2020 with Amazon Registrar, Inc. However, the website content is inaccessible, returning a 404 error with a JSON message indicating an invalid HTTP path. There is no visible metadata, structured data, or business information available on the site. This lack of content prevents meaningful analysis of the business model, services, or market positioning. Technically, the site does not present any detectable technologies or frameworks and lacks security headers or privacy policies. The security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS details and security best practices. Overall, the site appears to be either a backend intake endpoint or misconfigured, not intended for direct public access. This results in a low trust and quality score.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the website content as it is non-existent. The domain name suggests affiliation with Datadog, a known technology company, but no direct evidence or branding is present on this domain. The domain age and registration are consistent with a legitimate technology service domain. No contact information, certifications, or partner relationships are visible. The domain likely serves a technical or API function rather than a customer-facing website.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal due to lack of accessible content and absence of security headers or HTTPS information in the provided data. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain does not appear to be protected by a WAF or security challenge, but the site returns a 404 error, indicating no active content. This limits the ability to assess security maturity or compliance. Recommendations include implementing HTTPS, security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Deploy meaningful website content or redirect to a valid resource to avoid 404 errors.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website returns a 404 error with JSON message indicating invalid HTTP path.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.browser-intake-datadoghq.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:3/17/2026 (193 days)
SANs:*.browser-intake-datadoghq.com, browser-intake-datadoghq.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(334 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:3.233.158.24, 3.233.158.26, 3.233.158.25
AAAA Records:2600:1f18:24e6:b900:2d16:a724:7ca3:5c63, 2600:1f18:24e6:b901:72e3:1bfe:b271:96b2, 2600:1f18:24e6:b902:a46c:a4a6:87fe:c14c
Name Servers:
ns-1264.awsdns-30.org
ns-128.awsdns-16.com
ns-1907.awsdns-46.co.uk
ns-560.awsdns-06.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML page with a JSON error message indicating an invalid HTTP path. No metadata, scripts, or technologies are detected. The domain is hosted via Amazon Registrar, Inc., suggesting AWS infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site likely functions as a backend intake endpoint rather than a public website. Technical risks include lack of HTTPS and security headers, which should be addressed to improve security posture.
Analyze Another Website