Skip to main content

Is brs.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Baltijas Reģionālā Šķīrējtiesa Reviews

B

Is brs.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Baltijas Reģionālā Šķīrējtiesa

Check if brs.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentLatviasmall
HTMLCSSMicrosoft FrontPage 5.0
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:36:51 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Baltijas Reģionālā Šķīrējtiesa is a Latvian-based arbitration institution established in 2002, providing alternative dispute resolution services primarily for civil disputes within the Baltic region. The organization positions itself as an independent, non-governmental entity offering faster, confidential, and binding arbitration compared to state courts. The website content is primarily informational, targeting businesses and legal entities seeking arbitration services. The site is built with outdated technology (Microsoft FrontPage 5.0) and lacks modern web features such as HTTPS, privacy policies, or interactive forms, which limits its digital maturity and security posture. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility despite technical shortcomings.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSMicrosoft FrontPage 5.0

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The institution operates in the legal arbitration sector, serving a niche market in the Baltic region. Its competitive advantages include a long-standing presence since 2002 and adherence to recognized arbitration frameworks like UNICITRAL. The business model focuses on service provision for dispute resolution, targeting companies and legal entities requiring arbitration. The lack of modern digital infrastructure and absence of privacy and security policies may hinder growth and trust in a digital-first environment. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The organization appears to be small-sized with a focused regional scope.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

b*****@brs.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716733****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a low security maturity level, with no HTTPS detected and absence of security headers or secure forms. The use of outdated web technology increases the risk of vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security posture is weak, exposing the organization to potential risks related to data protection and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Baltijas Reģionālā Šķīrējtiesa

Description:

Baltijas Reģionālā Šķīrējtiesa is a permanent arbitration institution established in June 2002, providing alternative dispute resolution services primarily for civil disputes in the Baltic region. It operates independently from state courts and aims to facilitate fast, confidential, and legally binding arbitration processes based on Latvian law and UNICITRAL arbitration regulations.

Key Services:
Arbitration of civil disputesAlternative dispute resolutionLegal arbitration process management
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSMicrosoft FrontPage 5.0
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a legal arbitration institution site in Latvian language

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.105.203.99 +a +mx +ip4:91.105.203.93 +ip4:91.105.203.94 +ip4:213.175.127.228/32 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:i8awixud@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:i8awixud@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:91.105.203.99
Name Servers:
ns1.colo.lvDNS only
ns2.colo.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: brs.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:165ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.105.203.99 +a +mx +ip4:91.105.203.93 +ip4:91.105.203.94 +ip4:213.175.127.228/32 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using legacy technology (Microsoft FrontPage 5.0) with static HTML and CSS. There is no evidence of modern frameworks, CMS, or hosting provider information. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, and SEO is minimal with basic meta tags only. Performance is likely slow due to outdated design and lack of optimization. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal user data collection but also limited insights into user behavior. The site would benefit from a full technical overhaul to improve user experience, security, and compliance.
Analyze Another Website