Skip to main content

Is btloader.com a Scam? Security Check Results - btloader.com Reviews

B

Is btloader.com Safe? Security Analysis for btloader.com

Check if btloader.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:34:46 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at btloader.com is currently inaccessible, presenting only a minimal 'Forbidden' message with no visible content, metadata, or business information. This indicates that the site is either blocked by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or restricted by server security settings, preventing any meaningful content or interaction. Due to this, no business overview, services, or market positioning can be determined. The lack of accessible content also prevents any assessment of the site's technical infrastructure or digital maturity. Security posture evaluation is limited by the absence of accessible data, but the blocking itself suggests a security mechanism is in place, albeit without visible security headers or policies. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility, resulting in a high-risk profile and limited trustworthiness.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the website due to the absence of accessible content or metadata. The domain uses privacy protection in WHOIS, and no contact or company information is available. This lack of transparency and content severely limits any insights into market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model. There are no indications of partnerships, revenue streams, or target customer segments. The domain's legitimacy is questionable given the lack of public-facing information.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website is effectively blocked, likely by a generic WAF or server security configuration, as indicated by the 'Forbidden' message and minimal HTML content. No security headers or HTTPS information is available to assess SSL configuration or best practices. The absence of privacy policies, contact channels for incident response, or vulnerability disclosures further weakens the security posture. While blocking access can be a protective measure, it also prevents legitimate users from verifying the site's trustworthiness and compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected due to lack of content, but the overall security maturity is very low.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications and improve trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website returns a minimal HTML page with only 'Forbidden' text, indicating access is blocked or restricted, likely by a WAF or server security configuration.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is completely blocked with a 'Forbidden' message

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 53 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:btloader.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/28/2025 (53 days)
SANs:btloader.com, *.btloader.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.171.133, 104.20.20.189
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::ac42:ab85, 2606:4700:10::6814:14bd
Name Servers:
anna.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
anuj.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2380092535, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:49ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML page with a 'Forbidden' message, indicating restricted access. No metadata, scripts, forms, or external links are present. The technology stack, frameworks, CMS, and hosting provider cannot be determined. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO are all poor due to lack of content. The site likely uses a generic WAF or server security rules to block access, but no specific technology or platform details are available. This represents a significant technical debt and modernization opportunity to improve user experience and business operations.
Analyze Another Website