Skip to main content

Is btu.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - “B.T.U. Company” SIA Reviews

Is btu.lv Safe? Security Analysis for “B.T.U. Company” SIA

Check if btu.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviamedium
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:32:52 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

“B.T.U. Company” SIA operates as a distributor and authorized service provider for a portfolio of well-known consumer brands in Latvia, including kitchenware, home appliances, and personal care products. The company has established partnerships with multiple international brands such as Zwilling, Ballarini, George Foreman, and others, positioning itself as a key regional player in retail distribution and after-sales service. The website serves primarily as an informational portal showcasing brand partnerships and providing contact details for warranty services. From a technical perspective, the website is basic with minimal interactive features, lacking modern CMS or frameworks. There is no evidence of advanced analytics, tracking, or security headers. The site appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks SEO and accessibility enhancements. The absence of HTTPS or security headers (based on available data) indicates a need for improved security infrastructure. Security posture is limited due to missing HTTPS and security policies. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the domain and business information appear consistent with a legitimate medium-sized retail distributor. Overall, the website is safe for general audiences but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and enhancing technical SEO and accessibility to improve trust and compliance.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the retail sector as a distributor and authorized service center for multiple international consumer brands. Its business model focuses on brand partnerships and after-sales service, targeting retail customers and service centers in Latvia. The company was founded in 2006 and maintains a medium-sized operation. The partnership ecosystem includes reputable brands, enhancing market credibility. Revenue streams likely derive from product distribution and service contracts. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of multiple brand partnerships suggests stable market positioning. The website reflects a straightforward business approach with limited digital marketing or e-commerce capabilities.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@btu.lv
i*****@tsc.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3716779****
+3716771****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. The absence of HTTPS and security headers is a critical gap, exposing users to potential interception risks. No privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR requirements. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or incident response contacts. Data protection practices are unclear, and no security certifications are displayed. The lack of analytics and tracking reduces privacy concerns but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security culture appears minimal, with significant room for improvement to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

“B.T.U. Company” SIA

Description:

Distributor and service provider for multiple well-known consumer brands including kitchenware, home appliances, and personal care products in Latvia.

Key Services:
Distribution of branded consumer productsWarranty and post-warranty service via authorized service center
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a basic informational site for a Latvian distributor of consumer brands.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:81.198.74.204
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 1727964978, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:110ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML and inline CSS styles without detectable modern frameworks or CMS platforms. No JavaScript libraries or analytics scripts were found, indicating minimal technical complexity. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are unavailable. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. The site lacks meta tags for SEO and does not implement structured data or Open Graph tags. Technical debt is evident in the absence of security best practices and modern web standards, presenting risks to business operations and user trust.
Analyze Another Website