Skip to main content

Is builder.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Builder.io Reviews

builder.io favicon

Is builder.io Safe? Security Analysis for Builder.io

Check if builder.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
ReactNext.jsEmotion CSS-in-JSGoogle Tag ManagerZoomInfo Pixel+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:53:51 AM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Builder.io is a technology company offering an AI-powered visual development platform designed to accelerate web and mobile experience creation. The platform targets development teams seeking to streamline content generation and optimization, positioning itself as an innovative SaaS solution in the visual development market. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure leveraging React, Next.js, and advanced CSS-in-JS styling, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers, though the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages suggests room for compliance improvement. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, with moderate user tracking and cookie consent mechanisms in place.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsEmotion CSS-in-JSGoogle Tag ManagerZoomInfo PixelCookielaw.org Consent Management

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Builder.io operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS delivery of visual development tools enhanced by AI capabilities. Its business model revolves around providing a platform that reduces development cycles from sprints to seconds, appealing to web and mobile development teams. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages social media for outreach. While WHOIS data is unavailable, the website's professionalism and technology stack support a medium-sized enterprise profile. The lack of direct contact details and formal policy pages may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, indicating a focused and controlled ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent implementation. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, terms of service, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and incident response readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is high but could be improved by adding formal policies and contact channels for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing documentation. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but incomplete.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to enhance transparency and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Builder.io

Description:

Builder is an AI-Powered Visual Development Platform that helps teams generate, iterate, and optimize web and mobile experiences in seconds instead of sprints.

Key Services:
Visual development platformAI-powered content generationWeb and mobile experience optimization
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsEmotion CSS-in-JSGoogle Tag ManagerZoomInfo PixelCookielaw.org Consent Management
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
ZoomInfo
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

73/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

87/100
Score

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.firebasemail.com include:5149643.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:ipma8z@ar.glockapps.com
Forensic Reports:ipma8z@fr.glockapps.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.builder.io
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid Until:8/27/2026 (355 days)
SANs:*.builder.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(255 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:151.101.1.195, 151.101.65.195
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1756306348, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:121ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.firebasemail.com include:5149643.spf10.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Builder.io's website is built on a modern tech stack including React and Next.js, with CSS-in-JS styling via Emotion. The site loads scripts asynchronously, uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, and integrates cookie consent management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata present. The absence of detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and formal policy documentation are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Analyze Another Website