Skip to main content

Is bukovice.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - bukovice.cz Reviews

B

Is bukovice.cz Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if bukovice.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 7:21:51 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website bukovice.cz is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page with no visible content or metadata. The domain is registered since 2005 with a Czech registrar and uses AWS nameservers, indicating a legitimate registration and hosting setup. However, the lack of accessible content, contact information, and security policies severely limits the ability to assess the business or technical maturity of the site. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no security headers or HTTPS information was provided. This results in a very low security posture and poor overall website quality. The site appears to be either restricted intentionally or misconfigured, blocking any meaningful user or automated access.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible content and business information on the website, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a long-standing presence, but without visible services, company details, or contact points, the market positioning, business model, and target audience remain unknown. The hosting on AWS and registration with a Czech registrar are positive indicators but insufficient to establish business credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of accessible content and headers. The 403 Forbidden response indicates some level of access control, but no information on HTTPS, security headers, or vulnerability disclosures is available. No privacy or incident response policies are found, and no contact channels for security incidents are provided. This suggests a low security maturity and potential compliance gaps.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Ensure the website is accessible to legitimate users and search engines by resolving the 403 Forbidden error.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page with minimal HTML content, indicating access is blocked or restricted.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

15/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.seznam.cz ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-lite@munipolis.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:18.157.121.127, 18.194.184.5
Name Servers:
ns-1199.awsdns-21.org
ns-1895.awsdns-44.co.uk
ns-348.awsdns-43.com
ns-901.awsdns-48.net
MX Records:
10: 8f186a1e56cc79ec.mx2.emailprofi.seznam.cz
20: 8f186a1e56cc79ec.mx1.emailprofi.seznam.cz
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:75ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.seznam.cz ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a minimal 403 Forbidden error page with no metadata, scripts, or forms. The domain uses AWS nameservers, indicating hosting on Amazon infrastructure. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. The lack of content and metadata suggests either a misconfiguration or intentional blocking. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be evaluated. Technical modernization and proper configuration are needed to enable content delivery and improve user experience.
Analyze Another Website