Skip to main content

Is bush41.org a Scam? Security Check Results - George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum Reviews

bush41.org favicon

Is bush41.org Safe? Security Analysis for George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum

Check if bush41.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Statesmedium
jQuery 3.2.1jQuery UIBootstrap 3.2.0Select2Slick Carousel+7 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 3:36:17 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum website serves as a comprehensive digital presence for the institution dedicated to preserving the legacy of the 41st President of the United States. It offers extensive educational resources, museum information, event details, and research access, targeting a broad audience including historians, educators, students, and the general public. The site is well-branded and professionally maintained, reflecting its affiliation with the National Archives and the George & Barbara Bush Foundation. Technically, the website employs a mature technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various Google services for analytics and search functionality. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and rich content. However, some modern security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is no visible cookie consent mechanism, which could be improved for better privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, indicating a solid baseline security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust analysis, but the website's professional appearance and institutional affiliations strongly support its legitimacy. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and authoritative source for information about the George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum, with recommendations to enhance privacy compliance and security header implementation to further strengthen its security posture.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.2.1jQuery UIBootstrap 3.2.0Select2Slick CarouseljQuery FancyboxSkrollrMasonryGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Custom Search Engine

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website positions the George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum as a key non-profit educational and cultural institution. Its business model relies on donations, memberships, and foundation support, with a focus on public service and historical preservation. The institution benefits from strong partnerships with the National Archives and related organizations, enhancing its credibility and reach. The site supports multiple revenue streams including event ticket sales and museum store purchases. The target audience is diverse, encompassing researchers, educators, students, and the general public interested in presidential history and public service. The presence of volunteer opportunities and educational programs indicates active community engagement and growth potential.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

l*****@nara.gov

Phone Numbers (1)

979*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS usage and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests limited formal incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and clearer incident response channels.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum

Description:

The George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum is a non-profit institution dedicated to preserving the legacy of the 41st President of the United States, George H.W. Bush. It offers museum exhibits, educational programs, research facilities, and public events.

Key Services:
Museum exhibits and toursEducational programs and field tripsResearch room access by appointmentPublic events and lecturesVolunteer opportunitiesMuseum store
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.2.1jQuery UIBootstrap 3.2.0Select2Slick CarouseljQuery FancyboxSkrollrMasonryGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Custom Search Engine
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerDigitalGov Web Vitals
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
DoubleClickBrandcdnXAD
Tracking Pixels:
DoubleClickXADBrandcdnDigitalGov
Marketing Tools:
Google Custom Search Engine
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mandrillapp.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

11 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(231 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:44.231.225.36
Name Servers:
ns23.domaincontrol.com
ns24.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
0: bush41-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025041500, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:80ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mandrillapp.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a combination of well-established front-end libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel, ensuring responsive and interactive user experience. Google services including Tag Manager, Analytics, and Custom Search Engine are heavily utilized for tracking and search functionality. The site is mobile-optimized and loads with moderate performance. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The technical implementation is solid but could be modernized by adopting newer frameworks and improving accessibility compliance. The presence of multiple Google Tag Manager containers and tracking pixels indicates extensive user data collection, which should be balanced with privacy considerations.
Analyze Another Website