Skip to main content

Is buslogistics.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Bus Logistics SIA Reviews

B

Is buslogistics.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Bus Logistics SIA

Check if buslogistics.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
JavaScriptIncomedia WebSite X5 Evolution v8.0.11
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:12:27 PM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Bus Logistics SIA is a small Latvian company specializing in bus and minibus rental services. The website is currently under construction and provides minimal information beyond basic contact details. The business model focuses on transportation services, targeting general customers needing bus or minibus rentals. The market position and competitive advantages cannot be assessed due to the lack of content and transparency. Technically, the website is built using Incomedia WebSite X5 Evolution, a website builder platform. The site lacks modern security features such as HTTPS and security headers, and no analytics or tracking technologies are present. The minimal content and absence of privacy or cookie policies indicate a low level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site shows critical weaknesses including no SSL/TLS encryption and no visible security best practices. The absence of privacy compliance measures and incident response information further lowers the security posture. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website presents a high risk due to poor content quality, lack of security controls, and minimal business information. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and content development are essential to enhance trust and operational readiness.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptIncomedia WebSite X5 Evolution v8.0.11

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation sector, providing bus and minibus rental services primarily in Latvia. The business appears small with no visible subsidiaries or parent companies. The lack of detailed content and absence of certifications or trust indicators suggest a nascent or low-profile market presence. Revenue streams likely derive from rental fees. The target customer segment is general consumers or organizations requiring group transport. No partnerships or ecosystem integrations are evident from the website. Growth indicators and competitive positioning cannot be assessed due to limited data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@buslogistics.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716704****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is low. The website lacks HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies, exposing it to risks such as data interception and non-compliance with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The absence of analytics and tracking reduces privacy concerns but also limits business intelligence. The minimal security posture poses risks to customer trust and regulatory compliance. No vulnerabilities were detected from the limited content, but the lack of security controls is a critical gap.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bus Logistics SIA

Description:

Autobusu un mikroautobusu noma (Bus and minibus rental)

Key Services:
Bus rentalMinibus rentalTransport services
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptIncomedia WebSite X5 Evolution v8.0.11
SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is under construction with minimal content

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'default' uses 1008-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.242 ip4:91.203.68.168 ip4:91.203.68.167 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:85.31.97.34 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1008-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.168
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: buslogistics.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025061201, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:84ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.242 ip4:91.203.68.168 ip4:91.203.68.167 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:85.31.97.34 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Incomedia WebSite X5 Evolution platform, using basic JavaScript and minimal external resources. The site is under construction with limited content and no forms or interactive elements. No modern frameworks or CMS detected beyond the builder platform. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but are likely basic. The lack of SEO optimization and accessibility features limits discoverability and user experience. Technical debt is low due to minimal implementation but modernization is needed for security and compliance.
Analyze Another Website