Skip to main content

Is buv.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - buv.lv Reviews

B

Is buv.lv Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if buv.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:15:27 PM
37
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website buv.lv is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page indicating restricted access or misconfiguration. The content is minimal and does not provide any business or service information. The WHOIS lookup failed due to query limits, preventing extraction of domain registration details and limiting trust assessment. The only contact information found is a webmaster email address. The site appears to be hosted on a cPanel server but lacks any visible security headers, privacy policies, or analytics integrations. Overall, the digital maturity and security posture are very low due to lack of accessible content and configuration issues.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible content and business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There are no indications of market positioning, business model, or target audience. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with common regulations. No partnerships or related domains were identified. The domain's legitimacy cannot be verified without WHOIS data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

w*****@buv.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor as the site returns a 403 Forbidden error, which may indicate misconfiguration or intentional blocking. No security headers or SSL configuration details are present in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site is likely protected or restricted by a generic security mechanism but lacks transparency and best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve the 403 Forbidden error to allow legitimate user access.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or restricted. No WAF vendor branding detected but access is denied.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.197 ip4:85.31.97.26 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.66 +ip4:193.46.236.34 ?all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:?all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.197
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: buv.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025062000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.197 ip4:85.31.97.26 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.66 +ip4:193.46.236.34 ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website HTML is minimal and only serves a 403 Forbidden error page with no scripts, forms, or external libraries detected. The site uses cPanel hosting as indicated by the footer branding. No CMS or frameworks are identified. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site lacks modern technical implementations and requires configuration improvements to restore access and functionality.
Analyze Another Website