Skip to main content

Is c-ctrip.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 携程旅行网 Reviews

Is c-ctrip.com Safe? Security Analysis for 携程旅行网

Check if c-ctrip.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationChinaenterprise
JavaScriptReact (implied by data-reactroot attributes)Google Tag ManagerBaidu AnalyticsService Workers+1 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 11:46:40 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Ctrip.com is a leading Chinese online travel service provider offering a comprehensive range of travel-related services including hotel bookings, flight reservations, train tickets, car rentals, cruises, and travel insurance. The platform targets a broad audience of over 90 million members, primarily within China but also serving international travelers. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern web technologies such as React, service workers, and integration with major analytics and marketing platforms like Google Tag Manager and Baidu Analytics. Despite the absence of WHOIS registration details, the website's extensive service offerings, professional design, and consistent branding strongly indicate a legitimate and enterprise-level business. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security headers and privacy policies are not clearly presented in the analyzed content. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or security challenges and is safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptReact (implied by data-reactroot attributes)Google Tag ManagerBaidu AnalyticsService WorkersWebP image support detection

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Ctrip operates as an essential entity in the transportation and hospitality sectors, leveraging an online platform business model that integrates multiple travel services. Its market position as a leading travel service provider in China is supported by a wide range of offerings and a large user base. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem with multiple subsidiary domains dedicated to specific travel services. Revenue streams likely include commissions from bookings, advertising, and value-added services such as insurance and visa facilitation. The platform's growth is indicated by continuous content updates and marketing efforts. However, the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks in international markets.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and modern web security practices such as service workers and script integrity measures. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure information indicate room for improvement. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts suggests a need for ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with clearer privacy compliance and incident response transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publicly disclose comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR and global privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

携程旅行网

Description:

携程旅行网是中国领先的在线旅行服务公司,向超过9000万会员提供酒店预订、酒店点评及特价酒店查询、机票预订、飞机票查询、时刻表、票价查询、航班查询、度假预订、商旅管理、为您的出行提供全方位旅行服务。

Key Services:
酒店预订机票预订旅游度假商旅管理火车票汽车票船票租车签证保险
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptReact (implied by data-reactroot attributes)Google Tag ManagerBaidu AnalyticsService WorkersWebP image support detection
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Service Workers with fallback
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsBaidu Analytics
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Baidu AdvertisingGoogle DoubleClick
Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Baidu Marketing Scripts
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a large, enterprise-level online travel service platform targeting Chinese and international travelers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=120"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.ctrip.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_reports@trip.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

70/100
Score

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

119 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.ctrip.com
Issuer:DigiCert TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:2/6/2026 (187 days)
SANs:*.ctrip.com, ctrip.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(354 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:180.163.115.16, 211.95.54.121, 117.135.161.18, 117.131.27.7, 114.80.56.121, 220.196.164.16
Name Servers:
ns1.ctrip.com
ns2.ctrip.com
ns3.ctrip.com
ns4.ctrip.comDNS only
ns5.ctrip.com
ns6.ctrip.com
ns7.ctrip.com
ns8.ctrip.com
vip3.alidns.com
vip4.alidns.com
MX Records:
10: mx1.ctrip.com.ctripgslb.com
50: mx3.ctrip.com.ctripgslb.com
10: mx2.ctrip.com.ctripgslb.com
SOA:Serial: 2016146220, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.ctrip.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, likely React, and employs service workers for offline or performance enhancements. It integrates multiple external domains for content delivery, marketing, and analytics. Performance appears moderate with some optimization potential, especially for mobile responsiveness and accessibility. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not explicit but likely involve a CDN and cloud infrastructure given the domain patterns. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and incomplete security header implementation.
Analyze Another Website