Skip to main content

Is cakcz.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - ČAK CZ s.r.o. Reviews

Č

Is cakcz.cz Safe? Security Analysis for ČAK CZ s.r.o.

Check if cakcz.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateCzech Republicsmall
HTML5CSSJavaScriptjQuery 2.0.3MooTools+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 1:36:39 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

ČAK CZ s.r.o. is a small Czech construction and trading company specializing in water management, engineering networks, transport construction, and earthworks. Founded in 1998 and based in Kroměříž, the company serves municipalities, private companies, and individuals, emphasizing quality and compliance with ISO standards. Their website reflects a professional presence with detailed business descriptions and references to certifications but lacks modern privacy and security features. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries and lacks HTTPS enforcement, which poses security risks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in HTTPS adoption and security headers. The website is safe for general audiences and does not contain adult or questionable content.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScriptjQuery 2.0.3MooToolsSlimboxGoogle Fonts (Source Sans Pro)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a stable market position as a regional construction firm with over two decades of experience. Their business model focuses on infrastructure and civil engineering projects, targeting municipalities and private sector clients. The presence of ISO certifications and positive client references supports credibility. The website's lack of social media and modern marketing tools suggests a traditional business approach. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified beyond the design partner Traxart Graphics. Growth indicators are moderate, with a focus on quality and client satisfaction.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@traxartgraphics.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is basic. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement and uses an outdated jQuery version loaded over HTTP, exposing it to mixed content vulnerabilities. No security headers were detected, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The company demonstrates awareness of quality and safety standards through ISO certifications but does not extend this rigor to digital security practices. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The absence of contact forms reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS across the entire website and update all external resources to HTTPS to eliminate mixed content issues.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ČAK CZ s.r.o.

Description:

ČAK CZ s.r.o. is a construction and trading company founded in 1998, based in Kroměříž, Czech Republic. They specialize in water management construction, engineering networks such as water supply and sewerage, transport construction, earthworks, and construction works on buildings. Their clients include municipalities, private companies, and individuals. The company emphasizes quality work and compliance with ISO standards related to quality management, environmental protection, and occupational health and safety.

Key Services:
Water management constructionEngineering networks (water supply, sewerage)Transport constructionEarthworksConstruction works on buildings
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScriptjQuery 2.0.3MooToolsSlimboxGoogle Fonts (Source Sans Pro)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
45/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of ISO standards for quality, environment, and safety

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content and no blocking mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:212.111.31.83 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-rua@aitelogic.cz!20m

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:212.111.31.83
Name Servers:
ns1.aite.cz
ns2.aite.cz
MX Records:
10: kraken.aite.cz
SOA:Serial: 2025030501, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:80ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ip4:212.111.31.83 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, including legacy libraries like MooTools and an outdated jQuery version loaded insecurely. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site lacks a CMS or modern frameworks, indicating a static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization noted. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no ARIA roles or advanced features detected. SEO is basic, relying on meta tags but lacking structured data or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider details are not available from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with modernization opportunities to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Analyze Another Website