Skip to main content

Is cakewallet.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Cake Labs LLC Reviews

cakewallet.com favicon

Is cakewallet.com Safe? Security Analysis for Cake Labs LLC

Check if cakewallet.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebP imagesSVG graphics
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 7:01:07 AM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Cake Wallet, operated by Cake Labs LLC, is a medium-sized technology company based in the US, founded in 2018. It provides a secure, user-friendly cryptocurrency wallet supporting multiple coins and integrated payment solutions via Cake Pay. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Next.js and React, optimized for performance and mobile devices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and open source transparency, though explicit privacy and cookie policies are not prominently presented. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the crypto wallet market.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebP imagesSVG graphics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Cake Wallet targets cryptocurrency users seeking privacy, security, and ease of use. Its business model revolves around software provision with built-in exchange and payment features, serving over 500,000 users. The company leverages open source development to build trust and engages users via documentation, blog, and community forums. Partnerships like Cake Pay enhance its ecosystem. The company shows consistent branding and clear market positioning in the crypto finance sector.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@cakewallet.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs strong security best practices including HTTPS, multiple security headers, and no visible sensitive data exposure. The open source nature of the wallet code adds transparency. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in formal security governance and compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were detected in the content.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Cake Labs LLC

Description:

Since 2018, Cake Wallet has provided a secure, seamless, and reliable way to store, send, and exchange cryptocurrency with confidence.

Key Services:
Cryptocurrency walletBuilt-in exchangeCrypto payments via Cake PaySupport for multiple cryptocurrencies
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebP imagesSVG graphics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
WebiOSAndroid
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Open source transparency
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Fathom Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
usefathom.com
Marketing Tools:
Fathom Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:017de8f014b441c68a127b57d9ddd451@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:cakewallet.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/29/2025 (52 days)
SANs:cakewallet.com, *.cakewallet.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:104.26.12.103, 172.67.68.49, 104.26.13.103
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::681a:d67, 2606:4700:20::681a:c67, 2606:4700:20::ac43:4431
Name Servers:
nena.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
shane.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382333248, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack with optimized images and SVG graphics, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. SEO and accessibility features are well implemented. No CMS detected, likely a custom or static site. Hosting provider details are not explicit but performance and security headers suggest a professional hosting environment. The site uses minimal tracking (Fathom Analytics), aligning with privacy-conscious design. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and user-friendly experience.
Analyze Another Website