Skip to main content

Is caldera.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Caldera Reviews

caldera.xyz favicon

Is caldera.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Caldera

Check if caldera.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Framer (website builder)Cloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:02:01 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Caldera.xyz is a blockchain technology company focused on creating a network of interconnected, purpose-built blockchains that settle on Ethereum. The website presents a professional and modern design built with Framer, targeting blockchain developers and enterprises interested in blockchain interoperability. The business appears to be a small, niche player founded in 2020, with a clear focus on blockchain infrastructure services. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies and is hosted with Cloudflare DNS, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but could be improved with additional headers and policies. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and credible but lacks transparency in privacy and contact information, which impacts trust and compliance scores.

Detected Technologies

Framer (website builder)Cloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Caldera operates in the blockchain technology sector, providing interoperability solutions that leverage Ethereum as a settlement layer. The business model revolves around blockchain infrastructure, targeting developers and enterprises requiring interconnected blockchain networks. The company is relatively young, founded in 2020, and does not disclose parent or subsidiary relationships. The website content is consistent with a technology startup, with no evident partnerships or certifications displayed. The lack of contact information and compliance policies suggests an early-stage or stealth mode operation. Market positioning is niche, focusing on blockchain interoperability, which is a competitive but growing segment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency in security management. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Caldera

Description:

Caldera is a network of interconnected, purpose-built blockchains, settling on Ethereum.

Key Services:
Interconnected blockchainsEthereum settlement layer
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer (website builder)Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built using Framer, a modern web design tool.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:syid0jq5@ag.us.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(234 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.223.52.2, 35.71.142.77
Name Servers:
selah.ns.cloudflare.com
terry.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382432866, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:93ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design platform, and is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. The site uses modern fonts and responsive design techniques, providing a good mobile experience. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. SEO is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced SEO schema or structured data beyond minimal metadata. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected in the truncated HTML. The site lacks analytics and marketing tools, indicating a minimal tracking footprint. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and compliance documentation suggests areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Analyze Another Website