Skip to main content

Is campusmanitoba.ca a Scam? Security Check Results - campusmanitoba.ca Reviews

campusmanitoba.ca favicon

Is campusmanitoba.ca Safe? Security Analysis for Campus Manitoba – Unlocking Manitoba's potential by empowering students and educators.

Check if campusmanitoba.ca is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationCanadamedium
WordPressAvada ThemeGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerjQuery+2 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:04:38 PM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Campus Manitoba is an educational platform aimed at empowering students and educators within the Manitoba region. The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, incorporating modern web technologies and standard security measures such as Google reCAPTCHA and Google Tag Manager for analytics and bot protection. The site presents a professional design with good content relevance and user experience, targeting the education sector in Canada. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and ownership details. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in implementing security headers and explicit privacy policies. Overall, the website appears functional and safe but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressAvada ThemeGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryCSS3HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets the education sector, focusing on students and educators in Manitoba, Canada. It likely operates as a medium-sized organization or initiative, providing educational resources or services. The business model appears to be informational or service-oriented within the public or non-profit education domain. The use of WordPress and Avada theme suggests a standard digital presence without heavy custom development. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating some level of digital marketing and user behavior tracking. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies suggests potential gaps in user engagement and compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, which are positive indicators. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies reduces compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. The WHOIS data absence is a concern for domain trustworthiness. Incident response and security policy information are not present, indicating limited transparency in security governance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Campus Manitoba is an educational platform focused on empowering students and educators in Manitoba.

Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressAvada ThemeGoogle reCAPTCHAGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryCSS3HTML5
Frameworks:
Avada
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content and no WAF blocking.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:66.102.133.110 +a +mx +ip4:64.34.75.143 +include:spf.hostpapa.com +ip4:142.13.148.0/28 +ip4:142.13.17.222/32 +include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.envoke.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:LacroixK@campusmanitoba.ca

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:campusmanitoba.ca
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/18/2025 (46 days)
SANs:campusmanitoba.ca, *.campusmanitoba.ca

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(294 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.129.90, 104.21.2.155
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3031::6815:29b, 2606:4700:3031::ac43:815a
Name Servers:
gemma.ns.cloudflare.com
ignat.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: campusmanitoba-ca.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2384062478, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:44ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:66.102.133.110 +a +mx +ip4:64.34.75.143 +include:spf.hostpapa.com +ip4:142.13.148.0/28 +ip4:142.13.17.222/32 +include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.envoke.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Avada theme, a popular and well-supported framework. It uses Google reCAPTCHA for form security and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a modern approach to user interaction and data collection. The site appears mobile optimized with good design quality and navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely due to standard WordPress hosting and theme overhead. Accessibility features are basic but present. No advanced hosting or CDN information was found. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Analyze Another Website