Skip to main content

Is caniuse.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Fyrd Reviews

caniuse.com favicon

Is caniuse.com Safe? Security Analysis for Fyrd

https://caniuse.com

Check if caniuse.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptGoogle Fonts (Inconsolata)Google AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseBrowserStack integration+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 2:13:30 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Can I use is a well-established online resource providing comprehensive browser support tables for modern web technologies such as HTML5 and CSS3. Founded in 2010, it serves primarily web developers and front-end engineers by offering up-to-date compatibility data and integration tools. The site is recognized as an authoritative source in the web development community, supported by community contributions and partnerships such as with BrowserStack for live browser testing. The business model is primarily informational with revenue from advertising and optional Patreon support.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Fonts (Inconsolata)Google AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseBrowserStack integrationCustom CSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website holds a strong market position as a trusted reference for browser compatibility, leveraging open source data and community input. Its partnership ecosystem includes BrowserStack, enhancing its service offering. The business targets technical professionals and developers globally, with a small but focused operational size. Revenue streams include advertising and patronage. The site maintains a consistent brand and high content quality, supporting its reputation and user trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs HTTPS and modern web technologies, ensuring secure data transmission. However, it lacks explicit security headers and publicly available security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, indicating room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and the site follows good practices such as asynchronous script loading. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and DNSSEC implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Fyrd

Description:

"Can I use" provides up-to-date browser support tables for support of front-end web technologies on desktop and mobile web browsers.

Key Services:
Browser support tables for web technologiesFeature comparison toolsIntegration tools and third-party componentsPartnership with BrowserStack for live browser testing
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Fonts (Inconsolata)Google AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseBrowserStack integrationCustom CSSHTML5
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL and scripts)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts
  • Use of async and defer for scripts to improve performance

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a well-established, authoritative resource for web technology compatibility data.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:199.250.214.41 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:199.250.214.41
Name Servers:
ns1.inmotionhosting.comDNS only
ns2.inmotionhosting.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: caniuse.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071800, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:38ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:199.250.214.41 -all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Google Adsense, with asynchronous and deferred script loading for performance optimization. Hosting is provided by InMotion Hosting, indicated by nameservers. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is fast, and the site integrates third-party tools effectively. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security policies.
Analyze Another Website