Skip to main content

Is capitalis.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Capitalis.lv Reviews

capitalis.lv favicon

Is capitalis.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Capitalis.lv

Check if capitalis.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:56:41 PM
35
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Capitalis.lv is a Latvian company specializing in engineering systems and construction project management, targeting local businesses and institutions. The website showcases completed projects such as schools and sports halls, indicating a focus on real estate and construction sectors. The business model is service-oriented, providing engineering and maintenance services within a niche local market. The website is built on WordPress, using common web technologies like jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics for tracking. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with moderate performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is average; HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security headers or policies are implemented. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which impacts compliance and user trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the real estate and construction sector in Latvia, focusing on engineering systems and project execution. Its market position appears to be a small local player with a portfolio of completed projects. The business model relies on service delivery to local clients, including schools and commercial properties. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. Revenue streams likely come from engineering and maintenance contracts. The website lacks extensive marketing or trust signals such as certifications or client testimonials. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the available data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

o*****@capitalis.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712863****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with IP anonymization in Google Analytics, indicating some attention to security and privacy. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, and no security.txt file is found. The site uses WordPress 4.7.29, which is outdated and may expose the site to vulnerabilities if not patched. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is basic, with room for significant improvement to protect user data and enhance trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Capitalis.lv

Description:

Capitalis.lv appears to be a company involved in engineering systems and construction projects, showcasing completed projects such as schools, sports halls, and service objects. The website is in Latvian language and targets local clients interested in construction and engineering services.

Key Services:
Engineering systemsConstruction project managementMaintenance of service objects
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

50/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
\v=spf1 mx mx:mail.capitalis.lv -all\
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

17 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.238
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
50: mail.capitalis.lv
SOA:Serial: 1555407495, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:181ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
\v=spf1 mx mx:mail.capitalis.lv -all\

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 4.7.29, using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. Google Fonts and Font Awesome are used for typography and icons. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are implemented for traffic analysis and marketing. The site loads multiple CSS and JS files from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. Accessibility features are minimal but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. The site does not use advanced modern frameworks or progressive web app features. Technical debt is indicated by outdated WordPress version and missing security best practices.
Analyze Another Website