Skip to main content

Is carbon.website a Scam? Security Check Results - carbon.website Reviews

carbon.website favicon

Is carbon.website Safe? Security Analysis for Carbon Browser – Your Very Fast Private Web3 Browser

Check if carbon.website is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Google FontsCloudflare DNSMatomo AnalyticsBootstrap 4Elementor+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:12:55 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website 'carbon.website' is a relatively new online presence, established in December 2022, utilizing WordPress CMS with Elementor and Bootstrap frameworks. It employs Cloudflare DNS services and Matomo analytics for visitor tracking. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenge, indicating no blocking mechanisms in place. However, it lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service, and does not provide any contact information or security policies. The technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enabling DNSSEC and implementing security headers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but with room for improvement, especially in privacy compliance and vulnerability disclosure. The content quality is basic with limited business information, and no explicit or adult content is present, making it safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

Google FontsCloudflare DNSMatomo AnalyticsBootstrap 4ElementorWordPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business behind 'carbon.website' is not explicitly identified on the site, with no company name, description, or contact details provided. The domain is registered via Namecheap and uses Cloudflare DNS, which is common for many websites. The lack of business information and compliance documents suggests a small or early-stage operation. The site targets a general audience but does not clearly define its market position or services. The use of Matomo analytics indicates an interest in visitor data, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies raises compliance concerns. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries linked to the domain. Overall, the business intelligence points to a small-scale or personal project rather than an established commercial entity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security measures include HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, which prevents unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, and there is no security.txt file or incident response contact information. The site does not disclose any security frameworks or certifications. Forms and data collection mechanisms are minimal or absent, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The overall security posture is moderate but lacks comprehensive best practices and transparency, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google FontsCloudflare DNSMatomo AnalyticsBootstrap 4ElementorWordPress
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
blockchainads.matomo.cloud
Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Marketing Tools:
Matomo Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=0"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:carbon.website ip4:5.254.55.39 ?all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:?all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:carbon.website
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/2/2025 (56 days)
SANs:carbon.website, *.carbon.website

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(88 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.32.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.48.1, 104.21.112.1, 104.21.64.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.96.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001
Name Servers:
iris.ns.cloudflare.com
jaziel.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: mail.carbon.website
SOA:Serial: 2381352993, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:105ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:carbon.website ip4:5.254.55.39 ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Bootstrap 4 framework, indicating a modern and responsive design approach. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Matomo analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, which can provide performance and security benefits. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and potential security risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small website but requires enhancements to meet higher security and compliance standards.
Analyze Another Website