Skip to main content

Is cb.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - Církev bratrská Reviews

cb.cz favicon

Is cb.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Církev bratrská

Check if cb.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitCzech Republicmedium
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityTurbo Frames (Hotwire)Bootstrap (CSS framework)JavaScript ES Modules+1 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:30:21 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Církev bratrská is a well-established Protestant, reformed, and evangelical church organization operating primarily in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The website serves as an official portal providing information about the church's history, beliefs, activities, events, and community services. It features rich multimedia content, news updates, and educational resources, targeting members and interested visitors. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Turbo Frames, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Plausible Analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityTurbo Frames (Hotwire)Bootstrap (CSS framework)JavaScript ES ModulesPlausible Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization positions itself as a significant religious entity with a long history dating back to 1882. It operates as a non-profit entity focusing on spiritual services, community engagement, education, and media outreach. The website reflects a medium-sized organization with consistent branding and active social media channels. Revenue streams likely include donations and event participation. The church maintains a network of congregations and activities, emphasizing transparency and community support. The lack of public WHOIS data is typical for privacy protection and does not detract from the organization's credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (113)

p*****@cb.cz
b*****@cb.cz
b*****@cb.cz
b*****@cb.cz
b*****@cb.cz
+108 more emails found

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, CSRF tokens on forms, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks some recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. The use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces moderate tracking but no evident vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Církev bratrská

Description:

Církev bratrská je protestantská, reformovaná a evangelikální církev, která vznikla roku 1882 sloučením Svobodné evangelické církve české a Svobodné reformované církve. Působí v České republice a na Slovensku.

Key Services:
Religious services and worshipCommunity activities and eventsEducational programs and seminarsMedia and publicationsCharitable and social support
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityTurbo Frames (Hotwire)Bootstrap (CSS framework)JavaScript ES ModulesPlausible Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft ClarityPlausible Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft ClarityPlausible Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'dkim' uses 264-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.amagical.net ?all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:?all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(264-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

18 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:5.180.201.130
Name Servers:
ns.amagical.czDNS only
ns.amagical.net
ns.amagical.org
MX Records:
10: mta01.amagical.net
10: mta02.amagical.net
10: mta03.amagical.net
SOA:Serial: 2021102209, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:276ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.amagical.net ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with Ruby on Rails backend inferred from Turbo Frames and authenticity tokens, combined with Bootstrap for responsive design. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Plausible, providing comprehensive user behavior insights. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing images and script loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Analyze Another Website