Skip to main content

Is ccohs.ca a Scam? Security Check Results - Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Reviews

ccohs.ca favicon

Is ccohs.ca Safe? Security Analysis for Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety

https://ccohs.ca

Check if ccohs.ca is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentCanadamedium
jQuery 3.5.1WET-BOEW 4.0.65Google Analytics (UA and GA4)Ruxit (Dynatrace) monitoring
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:52:21 AM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) is a Canadian government agency dedicated to promoting safe and healthy working environments by providing comprehensive occupational health and safety information, training, and resources. The website serves as a national authoritative source for workers, employers, and health and safety professionals across Canada, offering a wide range of services including courses, databases, and business safety portals. The organization is well positioned in the government sector with consistent branding and a clear mission. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery and the WET-BOEW framework, ensuring good accessibility, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. It integrates Google Analytics and Dynatrace for performance and usage monitoring. The site is well structured with clear navigation and professional design, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure form handling, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism indicates areas for improvement in compliance and security hardening. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual but likely due to registry policies; this does not detract from the site's legitimacy given its government affiliation. Overall, the website presents a low risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent for privacy compliance, adding security headers, publishing incident response and security policies, and providing a vulnerability disclosure channel to enhance trust and security posture.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.5.1WET-BOEW 4.0.65Google Analytics (UA and GA4)Ruxit (Dynatrace) monitoring

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

CCOHS operates as a government entity providing occupational health and safety information and services primarily to Canadian workers and employers. Its market positioning is strong as the official national resource, supported by the Government of Canada. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on education, information dissemination, and compliance support. Revenue streams likely include government funding and paid services such as training and database subscriptions. The target customer segments include small to medium businesses, health and safety professionals, and workers. The partnership ecosystem includes other government departments and health organizations. The website's comprehensive content and service offerings indicate a mature operation with a focus on public service and compliance support.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or security policy page, nor a vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security culture appears cautious but could benefit from formalizing policies and improving technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety

Description:

The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) promotes a safe and healthy working environment by providing occupational health and safety information and advice.

Key Services:
Health and safety informationTraining coursesDatabasesBusiness Safety PortalConsultation and support services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.5.1WET-BOEW 4.0.65Google Analytics (UA and GA4)Ruxit (Dynatrace) monitoring
Frameworks:
WET-BOEW (Web Experience Toolkit)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics UAGoogle Analytics GA4Dynatrace Ruxit
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Dynatrace Ruxit
Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

14/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a:dazzle.ccohs.ca ip4:52.228.103.246 ip4:205.193.209.0/24 ip4:192.254.121.248 ip4:199.91.140.26 ip4:52.60.188.133 ip4:52.60.188.133 include:_phishspf.knowbe4.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:104.45.154.149 ip4:104.41.147.19 include:andarhosting.ca ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@cyber.gc.ca
Forensic Reports:dmarc@cyber.gc.ca

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

19 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(168 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:15.157.174.18, 99.79.143.76
Name Servers:
ns-1175.awsdns-18.org
ns-1617.awsdns-10.co.uk
ns-259.awsdns-32.com
ns-738.awsdns-28.net
MX Records:
0: ccohs-ca.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a:dazzle.ccohs.ca ip4:52.228.103.246 ip4:205.193.209.0/24 ip4:192.254.121.248 ip4:199.91.140.26 ip4:52.60.188.133 ip4:52.60.188.133 include:_phishspf.knowbe4.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:104.45.154.149 ip4:104.41.147.19 include:andarhosting.ca ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and government-standard technology stack including jQuery 3.5.1 and the WET-BOEW framework, which supports accessibility and responsive design. Google Analytics (both UA and GA4) and Dynatrace Ruxit are used for analytics and performance monitoring. The site is well structured with semantic HTML and ARIA roles, supporting accessibility. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or government-managed platform. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about ccohs.ca

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website