Skip to main content

Is cdn-cookieyes.com a Scam? Security Check Results - cdn-cookieyes.com Reviews

C

Is cdn-cookieyes.com Safe? Security Analysis for cdn-cookieyes.com

Check if cdn-cookieyes.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 11:40:22 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain cdn-cookieyes.com is registered since 2020 and is managed via NameCheap with Cloudflare DNS, indicating use as a content delivery network or related service domain. The website content is minimal, consisting solely of a simple 'OK' message, suggesting that the actual content is either blocked by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or the domain serves as a backend CDN endpoint rather than a public-facing website. Due to the lack of accessible content, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or business information is available. The technical infrastructure shows use of Cloudflare for DNS and likely hosting, but no further technology stack details can be extracted. Security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to the absence of content and headers. The domain WHOIS data is consistent and shows no privacy protection, with a long registration period and clientTransferProhibited status, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site appears to be a backend or CDN domain with limited public-facing information and is likely protected by Cloudflare's security mechanisms.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the domain name and registration details, cdn-cookieyes.com likely serves as a content delivery network domain for CookieYes, a company providing cookie consent management solutions. The domain itself does not host business-facing content or marketing material. There is no direct evidence of business model, revenue streams, or customer segments from the accessible data. The domain's use of Cloudflare and NameCheap is typical for technology service providers. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the data. The lack of public content limits insights into market positioning or competitive advantages.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture assessment is limited by the minimal accessible content. The domain uses Cloudflare DNS, which provides some security benefits such as DDoS protection and WAF capabilities. However, no security headers or SSL/TLS configuration details are available from the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap if this domain is intended for direct user interaction. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. Overall, the security maturity appears low from the public data, but this may be due to the domain's role as a CDN endpoint rather than a full website.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced with valid SSL/TLS certificates.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Cloudflare Detected

Minimal HTML content with only 'OK' text and domain served via Cloudflare nameservers indicates possible WAF or security challenge blocking full content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and likely blocked by Cloudflare WAF or security mechanism.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:cdn-cookieyes.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/12/2025 (37 days)
SANs:cdn-cookieyes.com, *.cdn-cookieyes.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1324 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.18.62, 104.18.19.62
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:123e, 2606:4700::6812:133e
Name Servers:
anton.ns.cloudflare.com
clarissa.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 2381169480, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:40ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The domain is hosted behind Cloudflare, indicating use of a CDN and security services. The HTML content is minimal, containing only a simple 'OK' message, with no metadata, scripts, or forms detected. No CMS or frameworks are identifiable. The domain uses Cloudflare nameservers, which suggests robust hosting infrastructure but also possible content blocking or WAF challenges. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are poor given the minimal content. The technical setup is typical for a CDN or backend service domain rather than a public website.
Analyze Another Website